Literature DB >> 28516313

Dynamic changes in aortic impedance after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and its impact on exploratory outcome.

Yukari Kobayashi1,2, Juyong B Kim1,2, Kegan J Moneghetti1,2, Yuhei Kobayashi1,2, Ran Zhang1,2, Daniel A Brenner1,2,3, Ryan O'Malley1,2, Ingela Schnittger1,2, Michael Fischbein1,2, D Craig Miller1,2, Alan C Yeung1,2, David Liang1,2, Francois Haddad1,2, William F Fearon4,5.   

Abstract

Valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva) has been shown to predict worse outcome in medically managed aortic stenosis (AS) patients. We aimed to investigate the association between Zva and left ventricular (LV) adaptation and to explore the predictive value of Zva for cardiac functional recovery and outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We prospectively enrolled 128 patients with AS who underwent TAVR. Zva was calculated as: (systolic blood pressure + mean transaortic gradient)/stroke volume index). Echocardiographic assessment occurred at baseline, 1-month and 1-year after TAVR. The primary endpoints were to investigate associations between Zva and global longitudinal strain (GLS) at baseline as well as GLS change after TAVR. The secondary was to compare all-cause mortality after TAVR between patients with pre-defined Zva (=5 mmHg m2/ml), stroke volume index (=35 ml/m2), and GLS (=-15%) cutoffs. The mean GLS was reduced (-13.0 ± 3.2%). The mean Zva was 5.2 ± 1.6 mmHg*m2/ml with 55% of values ≥5.0 mmHg*m2/ml, considered to be abnormally high. Higher Zva correlated with worse GLS (r = -0.33, p < 0.001). After TAVR, Zva decreased significantly (5.1 ± 1.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.6 mmHg*m2/ml, p = 0.001). A reduction of Zva at 1-month was associated with GLS improvement at 1-month (r = -0.31, p = 0.001) and at 1-year (r = -0.36 and p = 0.001). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with higher Zva at baseline had higher mortality (Log-rank p = 0.046), while stroke volume index and GLS did not differentiate outcome (Log-rank p = 0.09 and 0.25, respectively). As a conclusion, Zva is correlated with GLS in AS as well as GLS improvement after TAVR. Furthermore, a high baseline Zva may have an additional impact to traditional parameters on predicting worse mortality after TAVR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Strain imaging; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; Ventricular impedance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28516313     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1155-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  39 in total

1.  Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Alec Vahanian; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen Bax; Eric Butchart; Robert Dion; Gerasimos Filippatos; Frank Flachskampf; Roger Hall; Bernard Iung; Jaroslaw Kasprzak; Patrick Nataf; Pilar Tornos; Lucia Torracca; Arnold Wenink
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: check the valve but don't forget the arteries!

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Jean G Dumesnil
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Samir R Kapadia; Martin B Leon; Raj R Makkar; E Murat Tuzcu; Lars G Svensson; Susheel Kodali; John G Webb; Michael J Mack; Pamela S Douglas; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Howard C Herrmann; Wilson Y Szeto; Augusto D Pichard; Mathew R Williams; Gregory P Fontana; D Craig Miller; William N Anderson; Jodi J Akin; Michael J Davidson; Craig R Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Impact of global left ventricular afterload on left ventricular function in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking study.

Authors:  Patrizio Lancellotti; Erwan Donal; Julien Magne; Kim O'Connor; Marie L Moonen; Bernard Cosyns; Luc A Pierard
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-03-04

Review 6.  Gender differences in older patients with pressure-overload hypertrophy of the left ventricle.

Authors:  G P Aurigemma; W H Gaasch
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.869

7.  Does the transapical approach impair early recovery of systolic strain following transcatheter aortic valve replacement?

Authors:  Tomo Ando; Anthony A Holmes; Cynthia C Taub; Joseph J DeRose; David P Slovut
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2015-08-01

8.  Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival.

Authors:  Zeineb Hachicha; Jean G Dumesnil; Peter Bogaty; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Impact of valvuloarterial impedance on 2-year outcome of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Spyridon Katsanos; Kai Hang Yiu; Marie-Annick Clavel; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Darryl Leong; Frank van der Kley; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Jeroen J Bax; Philippe Pibarot; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 5.251

10.  Left ventricular global systolic longitudinal deformation and prognosis 1 year after femoral and apical transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Brian Bridal Løgstrup; Henning R Andersen; Leif Thuesen; Evald H Christiansen; Kim Terp; Kaj-Erik Klaaborg; Steen H Poulsen
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.251

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  New Evidence About Aortic Valve Stenosis and Cardiovascular Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Costantino Mancusi; Edda Bahlmann; Christian Basile; Eva Gerdts
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2022-04-19

Review 2.  Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Current Evidence and Challenges Ahead.

Authors:  Ernest Spitzer; Ben Ren; Herbert Kroon; Lennart van Gils; Olivier Manintveld; Joost Daemen; Felix Zijlstra; Peter P de Jaegere; Marcel L Geleijnse; Nicolas M Van Mieghem
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-08-17

Review 3.  Hypertension and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: parallel or series?

Authors:  Nidhish Tiwari; Nidhi Madan
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2018-11-23

4.  Short-term changes of blood pressure and aortic stiffness in older patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Jeannette A Goudzwaard; Eleonora Disegna; Marjo Jag de Ronde-Tillmans; Mattie J Lenzen; Peter Pt de Jaegere; Francesco Us Mattace-Raso
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Prognostic value of ventricular longitudinal strain in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yangjie Xiao; Wenjing Bi; Wei Qiao; Xin Wang; Ying Li; Weidong Ren
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-24

Review 6.  Expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement into uncharted indications.

Authors:  Guson Kang; Juyong Brian Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.884

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.