Literature DB >> 15710719

Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis.

L Kadem1, J G Dumesnil, R Rieu, L-G Durand, D Garcia, P Pibarot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of systemic arterial hypertension on the indices of aortic stenosis (AS) severity.
METHODS: A severe supravalvar AS was created in 24 pigs. The maximum and mean pressure gradients across the stenosis were measured by Doppler echocardiography and by catheterisation. Both echocardiography and catheter data were used to calculate stenosis effective orifice area, energy loss coefficient, and peak systolic left ventricular wall stress. Measurements were taken both at normal aortic pressures and during hypertension induced by banding of the distal thoracic aorta in 14 pigs and by intravenous administration of phenylephrine in 10 pigs.
RESULTS: During hypertension, systemic arterial resistance downstream from the stenosis increased greatly (all animals: 71 (40)%), whereas total systemic arterial compliance decreased significantly (-38 (21)%). Hypertension resulted in a moderate increase in effective orifice area (29 (14)%) and energy loss coefficient (25 (17)%) and substantial decreases in catheter gradients (maximum: -40 (20)%; mean: -43 (20)%; peak to peak: -70 (23)%) and Doppler gradients (maximum: -35 (17)%; mean: -37 (16)%). In multivariate analysis, peak to peak gradient was significantly (p < 0.001) related to the energy loss coefficient, mean flow rate, and arterial compliance, whereas maximum and mean catheter gradients were related only to the energy loss coefficient and flow rate. Of major importance, maximum systolic left ventricular wall stress increased greatly during hypertension (43 (23)%).
CONCLUSIONS: The severity of AS may be partially masked by the presence of coexisting hypertension. The markers of AS severity should thus be interpreted with caution in hypertensive patients and be re-evaluated when the patient is in a normotensive state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15710719      PMCID: PMC1768735          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2003.030601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  32 in total

1.  Contribution of systemic vascular resistance and total arterial compliance to effective arterial elastance in humans.

Authors:  Denis Chemla; Isabelle Antony; Yves Lecarpentier; Alain Nitenberg
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I.

Authors:  R GORLIN; S G GORLIN
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity: A new index based on the energy loss concept.

Authors:  D Garcia; P Pibarot; J G Dumesnil; F Sakr; L G Durand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-02-22       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Severe valvular aortic stenosis in patients over 65 years of age. A clinicopathologic study.

Authors:  W C Roberts; J K Perloff; T Costantino
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Symptomatic aortic stenosis: does systemic hypertension play an additional role?

Authors:  Francesco Antonini-Canterin; Guoqian Huang; Eugenio Cervesato; Pompilio Faggiano; Daniela Pavan; Rita Piazza; Gian Luigi Nicolosi
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-04-21       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle.

Authors:  W Grossman; D Jones; L P McLaurin
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Valve orifice area alone is an insufficient index of aortic stenosis severity: effects of the proximal and distal geometry on transaortic energy loss.

Authors:  R S Heinrich; R H Marcus; A E Ensley; D E Gibson; A P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  1999-09

8.  Nitroprusside in critically ill patients with left ventricular dysfunction and aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Umesh N Khot; Gian M Novaro; Zoran B Popović; Roger M Mills; James D Thomas; E Murat Tuzcu; Donald Hammer; Steven E Nissen; Gary S Francis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The mechanism of opening of the aortic valve.

Authors:  M Thubrikar; L P Bosher; S P Nolan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Pulse pressure/stroke index and left ventricular geometry and function: the LIFE Study.

Authors:  Vittorio Palmieri; Jonathan N Bella; Mary J Roman; Eva Gerdts; Vasilios Papademetriou; Kristian Wachtell; Markku S Nieminen; Björn Dahlöf; Richard B Devereux
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  28 in total

1.  Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: check the valve but don't forget the arteries!

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Jean G Dumesnil
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The effects of hypertension on aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  J Bermejo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and heart failure.

Authors:  Chirag Bavishi; Dhaval Kolte; Paul C Gordon; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Natural progression of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Antony Leslie Innasimuthu; Sanjay Kumar; Jason Lazar; William E Katz
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-06-01

Review 5.  Imaging Strategies for Evaluating Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis with Reduced and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Krishna Alluri; Blase A Carabello; Rajasekhar Nekkanti
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot; David Messika-Zeitoun; Romain Capoulade; Joseph Malouf; Shivani Aggarval; Phillip A Araoz; Hector I Michelena; Caroline Cueff; Eric Larose; Jordan D Miller; Alec Vahanian; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Systolic hypertension and progression of aortic valve calcification in patients with aortic stenosis: results from the PROGRESSA study.

Authors:  Lionel Tastet; Romain Capoulade; Marie-Annick Clavel; Éric Larose; Mylène Shen; Abdellaziz Dahou; Marie Arsenault; Patrick Mathieu; Élisabeth Bédard; Jean G Dumesnil; Alexe Tremblay; Yohan Bossé; Jean-Pierre Després; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 8.  Workup and Management of Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Marine Clisson; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-05-02

Review 9.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 10.  Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot; Blase Carabello
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.