Literature DB >> 7658539

Carcinoma of the penis: improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion.

W S McDougal1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was performed to validate a new staging system and support the concept of early regional lymphadenectomy based on this system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 76 cases from 4 teaching hospitals was reviewed.
RESULTS: Of 24 patients with well or moderately differentiated noninvasive primary tumors 1 had regional metastases compared to 43 of 52 patients with poorly differentiated or invasive tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: By classifying disease according to the depth of invasion and degree of differentiation of the primary lesions a high degree of accuracy could be obtained in predicting the likelihood of positive groin nodes. Removing groin nodes that are microscopically positive improves the survival rate over that of delayed lymphadenectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7658539     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66863-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  25 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary management of patients with penile cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Andrew Leone; Gregory J Diorio; Curtis Pettaway; Viraj Master; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced MRI for the staging of genitourinary tumors.

Authors:  Samdeep K Mouli; Lee C Zhao; Reed A Omary; C Shad Thaxton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Non-invasive and minimally invasive staging of regional lymph nodes in penile cancer.

Authors:  Ben Hughes; Joost Leijte; Majid Shabbir; Nick Watkin; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Feasibility of performing dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy as a delayed procedure in penile cancer.

Authors:  Savvas Omorphos; Zia Saad; Manit Arya; Alex Freeman; Peter Malone; Raj Nigam; Jamshed Bomanji; Asif Muneer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Lymphoscintigraphy in penile cancer: limited value of sentinel node biopsy in patients with clinically suspicious lymph nodes.

Authors:  E Hungerhuber; B Schlenker; D Frimberger; R Linke; A Karl; C G Stief; P Schneede
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  The expression of metaloproteinases-2 and -9 is different according to the patterns of growth and invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Fernando A Soares; Isabela Werneck da Cunha; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Sueli Nonogaki; Rodrigo Sousa Madeira Campos; Ademar Lopes
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  What next? Managing lymph nodes in men with penile cancer.

Authors:  Michael Leveridge; D Robert Siemens; Christopher Morash
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Current trends in the management of carcinoma penis--a review.

Authors:  Iqbal Singh; A Khaitan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  The impact of Improving Outcomes Guidance on the management and outcomes of patients with carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Andrew C Bayles; Krishna K Sethia
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 10.  Shortcomings of the current TNM classification for penile carcinoma: time for a change?

Authors:  Joost A P Leijte; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.