Literature DB >> 16688459

Lymphoscintigraphy in penile cancer: limited value of sentinel node biopsy in patients with clinically suspicious lymph nodes.

E Hungerhuber1, B Schlenker, D Frimberger, R Linke, A Karl, C G Stief, P Schneede.   

Abstract

The staging lymph node dissection in patients with penile carcinoma is accompanied with a high morbidity. As many patients are free of nodal metastases the lymphoscintigraphic sentinel node biopsy is supposed to minimize perioperative morbidity in these patients. In the current study the accuracy of the lymphoscintigraphic sentinel node biopsy was verified against the gold standard of radical inguinal dissection. In particular, patients with enlarged lymph nodes have also been included since one half of these patients is known to have histologically negative lymph nodes. Between 2000 and 2004 fifteen patients with penile carcinoma were elected to undergo bilateral groin dissection, thus 30 inguinal areas have been dissected. Nine patients have had clinically palpable nodes. All patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy after injection of Tc99-nanocolloid subcutaneously into the peritumoral area. Intraoperatively the sentinel nodes were identified with the aid of a gamma ray detection probe and excised. Afterwards a standard groin dissection was performed and the different lymph nodes were histopathologically assessed separately. In all patients lymph nodes with high radioactivity uptake were detected bilaterally. In 10 out of 30 inguinal areas histopathologically positive lymph nodes were present. In four of them the sentinel node was positive for tumor but in six dissection areas lymph node metastases were found despite a negative sentinel node. These patients had clinically palpable lymph nodes in their histologically positive inguinal regions. If no palpable nodes were present dynamic sentinel biopsy detected the positive nodes. The current study showed that dynamic sentinel node biopsy in patients with clinically suspicious lymph nodes is of low value for detection of lymphatic spread in penile cancer. Therefore the gold standard in these patients remains the radical groin dissection. However, dynamic sentinel node biospy is still a promising strategy to identify lymphatic spreading in clinically N0 patients and therefore to prevent unnecessary groin dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16688459     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-006-0073-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  25 in total

1.  Dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer: reliability of a staging technique.

Authors:  P J Tanis; A P Lont; W Meinhardt; R A Valdés Olmos; O E Nieweg; S Horenblas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Radical excision of the inguinal and iliac lymph glands; a study based upon 450 anatomical dissections and upon supportive clinical observations.

Authors:  E H DASELER; B J ANSON; A F REIMANN
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1948-12

3.  Cabanas approach: is sentinel node biopsy reliable for staging penile carcinoma?

Authors:  E Wespes; J Simon; C C Schulman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  First experience with gamma probe guided sentinel lymph node surgery in penile cancer.

Authors:  F Wawroschek; H Vogt; D Bachter; D Weckermann; M Hamm; R Harzmann
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2000-08

5.  Unreliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging penile carcinoma.

Authors:  E Perinetti; D B Crane; W J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Sentinel lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

Authors:  C A Pettaway; L L Pisters; C P Dinney; F Jularbal; D A Swanson; A C von Eschenbach; A Ayala
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Management of clinically node negative penile carcinoma: improved survival after the introduction of dynamic sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  A P Lont; S Horenblas; P J Tanis; M P Gallee; H van Tinteren; O E Nieweg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for penile and urethral squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  A M Hussein; P Benedetto; K S Sridhar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Carcinoma of the penis: improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion.

Authors:  W S McDougal
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Treatment of carcinoma of the penis: the case for primary lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  W S McDougal; F K Kirchner; R H Edwards; L T Killion
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [The significance of lymphadenectomy in the management of penile cancer].

Authors:  M Angerer-Shpilenya; G Jakse
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Non-invasive and minimally invasive staging of regional lymph nodes in penile cancer.

Authors:  Ben Hughes; Joost Leijte; Majid Shabbir; Nick Watkin; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Penile cancer: current therapy and future directions.

Authors:  G Sonpavde; L C Pagliaro; C Buonerba; T B Dorff; R J Lee; G Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Non-squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: single-center, 15-year experience.

Authors:  Kelvin A Moses; John P Sfakianos; Andrew Winer; Melanie Bernstein; Paul Russo; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Imaging in primary penile cancer: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Rohit Kochhar; Ben Taylor; Vijay Sangar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Factors predicting inguinal node metastasis in squamous cell cancer of penis.

Authors:  Suresh K Bhagat; Ganesh Gopalakrishnan; Nitin S Kekre; Ninan K Chacko; Santosh Kumar; M T Manipadam; Prasanna Samuel
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Value and efficiency of sentinel lymph node diagnostics in patients with penile carcinoma with palpable inguinal lymph nodes as a new multimodal, minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  Ulf Lützen; Maaz Zuhayra; Marlies Marx; Yi Zhao; Christian Colberg; Stephanie Knüpfer; René Baumann; Katharina Charlotte Kähler; Klaus-Peter Jünemann; Carsten Maik Naumann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Trial of ligation versus coagulation of lymphatics in dynamic inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  S La-Touche; B Ayres; W Lam; H M Alnajjar; M Perry; N Watkin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.891

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.