Literature DB >> 7651800

Part-whole information is useful in visual search for size x size but not orientation x orientation conjunctions.

A B Bilsky1, J M Wolfe.   

Abstract

In visual search tasks, subjects look for a target among a variable number of distractor items. If the target is defined by a conjunction of two different features (e.g., color x orientation), efficient search is possible when parallel processing of information about orientation is used to guide the deployment of attention to the target. Another type of conjunction search has targets defined by two instances of one type of feature (e.g., a conjunction of two colors). In this case, search is inefficient when the target is an item defined by parts of two different colors but much more efficient if the target can be described as a whole item of one color with a park of another color (Wolfe, Friedman-Hill, & Bilsky, 1994). In this paper, we show that the same distinction holds for size. "Part-whole" size x size conjunction searches are efficient; "part-part" searches are not (Experiments 1-3). In contrast, all orientation x orientation searches are inefficient (Experiments 4-6). This difference between preattentive processing of color and size, on the one hand, and orientation, on the other, may reflect structural relationships between features in real-world objects.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7651800     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  14 in total

Review 1.  Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review.

Authors:  R Kimchi
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention.

Authors:  H W Kwak; D Dagenbach; H Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-05

3.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K R Cave; S L Franzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Limitations on the parallel guidance of visual search: color x color and orientation x orientation conjunctions.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K P Yu; M I Stewart; A D Shorter; S R Friedman-Hill; K R Cave
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.

Authors:  A Treisman; S Gormican
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  The role of features in preattentive vision: comparison of orientation, motion and color cues.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering.

Authors:  A Treisman; D Kahneman; J Burkell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-06

9.  Parallel processing of part-whole information in visual search tasks.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; S R Friedman-Hill; A B Bilsky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-05

10.  The cost of visual filtering.

Authors:  D Kahneman; A Treisman; J Burkell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  5 in total

1.  Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search?

Authors:  C M Moore; H Egeth; L R Berglan; S J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-09

2.  The capacity limitations of orientation summary statistics.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Introduction to the special issue on visual working memory.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Guided search for triple conjunctions.

Authors:  Maria Nordfang; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The Effect of Attentional Cueing and Spatial Uncertainty in Visual Field Testing.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Michael Kalloniatis; Sieu K Khuu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.