Literature DB >> 25005070

Guided search for triple conjunctions.

Maria Nordfang1, Jeremy M Wolfe.   

Abstract

A key tenet of feature integration theory and of related theories such as guided search (GS) is that the binding of basic features requires attention. This would seem to predict that conjunctions of features of objects that have not been attended should not influence search. However, Found (1998) reported that an irrelevant feature (size) improved the efficiency of search for a Color × Orientation conjunction if it was correlated with the other two features across the display, as compared to the case in which size was not correlated with color and orientation features. We examined this issue with somewhat different stimuli. We used triple conjunctions of color, orientation, and shape (e.g., search for a red, vertical, oval-shaped item). This allowed us to manipulate the number of features that each distractor shared with the target (sharing) and it allowed us to vary the total number of distractor types (and, thus, the number of groups of identical items: grouping). We found that these triple conjunction searches were generally very efficient--producing very shallow Reaction Time × Set Size slopes, consistent with strong guidance by basic features. Nevertheless, both of the variables, sharing and grouping, modulated performance. These influences were not predicted by previous accounts of GS; however, both can be accommodated in a GS framework. Alternatively, it is possible, though not necessary, to see these effects as evidence for "preattentive binding" of conjunctions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25005070      PMCID: PMC5565881          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0715-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  56 in total

1.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  B McElree; M Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The role of priming in conjunctive visual search.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; DeLiang Wang; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-08

3.  "Effortless" texture segmentation and "parallel" visual search are not the same thing.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  A conjunctive feature similarity effect for visual search.

Authors:  Yuji Takeda; Steven Phillips; Takatsune Kumada
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  The binding problem lives on: comment on Di Lollo.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  The feature-binding problem is an ill-posed problem.

Authors:  Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Time to Guide: Evidence for Delayed Attentional Guidance in Contextual Cueing.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen J Flusberg; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2008

8.  Feature integration without visual attention: evidence from the correlated flankers task.

Authors:  J Toby Mordkoff; Rose Halterman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

9.  Parallel processing of part-whole information in visual search tasks.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; S R Friedman-Hill; A B Bilsky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-05

10.  Second-order parallel processing: visual search for the odd item in a subset.

Authors:  S Friedman-Hill; J M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  7 in total

1.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

Review 2.  What is a preattentive feature?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Igor S Utochkin
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-11-13

3.  Understanding visual attention in childhood: Insights from a new visual foraging task.

Authors:  Inga María Ólafsdóttir; Tómas Kristjánsson; Steinunn Gestsdóttir; Ómar I Jóhannesson; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-11-14

Review 4.  Early Visual Processing of Feature Saliency Tasks: A Review of Psychophysical Experiments.

Authors:  Shiva Kamkar; Hamid Abrishami Moghaddam; Reza Lashgari
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-26

5.  On Visually-Grounded Reference Production: Testing the Effects of Perceptual Grouping and 2D/3D Presentation Mode.

Authors:  Ruud Koolen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-01

6.  Competing Distractors Facilitate Visual Search in Heterogeneous Displays.

Authors:  Garry Kong; David Alais; Erik Van der Burg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Categorical grouping is not required for guided conjunction search.

Authors:  Igor S Utochkin; Vladislav A Khvostov; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.