Literature DB >> 765060

Thermodilution and Fick cardiac index determinations following cardiac surgery.

M Hodges, J B Downs, L A Mitchell.   

Abstract

With the thermodilution technique, repeated determination of cardiac index (CI) has become a rapid, easily accomplished, safe procedure. We paired 77 CI determinations measured by direct Fick and thermodilution techniques in 21 patients who underwent myocardial revascularization. Commercially available thermistor-tipped catheters and a cardiac output computer were used to determine CI according to the manufacturer's instructions. Oxygen consumption and arterial-venous oxygen content differences were measured directly to determine CI by the Fick method. Comparisons were made during mechanical ventilation with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and during spontaneous ventilation with and without PEEP. Cardiac indices measured by the two techniques were within +/- 0.5 L/min/m2 of each other only 76% of the time and within +/- 1.0 L/min/m2 96% of the time, if CI greater than or equal to 4.0 L/min/m2 were omitted. Ventilatory pattern had no apparent effect on results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 765060     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-197509000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  7 in total

1.  Doppler tissue imaging in children following cardiac transplantation: a comparison to catheter derived hemodynamics.

Authors:  David J Goldberg; Michael D Quartermain; Andrew C Glatz; E Kevin Hall; Erin Davis; Stephanie A Kren; Brian D Hanna; Meryl S Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2011-04-25

2.  Comparison of a modified Fick method with thermodilution for determining cardiac output in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  J Lynch; H Kaemmerer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Method of assessing the reproducibility of blood flow measurement: factors influencing the performance of thermodilution cardiac output computers.

Authors:  J D Mackenzie; N E Haites; J M Rawles
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-01

4.  Thermodilution and Fick cardiac outputs differ: impact on pulmonary hypertension evaluation.

Authors:  Wassim H Fares; Sarah K Blanchard; George A Stouffer; Patricia P Chang; Wayne D Rosamond; Hubert James Ford; Robert M Aris
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  Continuous noninvasive cardiac output as estimated from the pulse contour curve.

Authors:  I Gratz; J Kraidin; A G Jacobi; N G deCastro; P Spagna; G E Larijani
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1992-01

Review 6.  Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution.

Authors:  T Nishikawa; S Dohi
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Comparison of bedside measurement of cardiac output with the thermodilution method and the Fick method in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Jésus Gonzalez; Christian Delafosse; Muriel Fartoukh; André Capderou; Christian Straus; Marc Zelter; Jean-Philippe Derenne; Thomas Similowski
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.