Literature DB >> 2358558

Comparison of a modified Fick method with thermodilution for determining cardiac output in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation.

J Lynch1, H Kaemmerer.   

Abstract

We compared a modified Fick method for measuring cardiac output against the thermodilution method in 11 critically-ill patients on mechanical ventilation. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was calculated indirectly, by measuring the carbon dioxide elimination (VCO2) during steady state and by assuming an average respiratory quotient of 0.9. For a total of 129 measurements, the mean difference in cardiac output between both methods was 0.03 +/- 1.3 l/min (95% confidence interval, -0.19 to 0.25 l/min, p = 0.7) standard deviation, with the largest differences being measured in the low cardiac output range (less than 5 l/min). No statistically significant difference was found between the cardiac output values obtained with either method. These data showed a good correlation between the two methods and suggest that the modified Fick method may be useful in determining cardiac output in seriously ill patients on mechanical ventilation not requiring pulmonary arterial catheterisation, or where facilities for undertaking metabolic measurements are not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2358558     DOI: 10.1007/bf01705160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  22 in total

1.  Continuous Fick cardiac output compared to thermodilution cardiac output.

Authors:  G G Davies; P J Jebson; B M Glasgow; D R Hess
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Measurement of cardiac output by thermal dilution in man.

Authors:  M A Branthwaite; R D Bradley
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Cardiac output determination: thermodilution versus a new computerized Fick method.

Authors:  J P Carpenter; S Nair; I Staw
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Hypovolaemic shock.

Authors:  I M Ledingham; G Ramsay
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Assessment of caloric needs in stressed patients.

Authors:  J D Paauw; M A McCamish; R E Dean; T R Ouellette
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Instrumentation for monitoring gas exchange and metabolic rate in critically ill patients.

Authors:  D R Westenskow; C A Cutler; W D Wallace
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Can central venous blood replace mixed venous blood samples?

Authors:  J Tahvanainen; O Meretoja; P Nikki
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Accuracy of an indirect carbon dioxide Fick method in determination of the cardiac output in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  L Blanch; R Fernández; S Benito; J Mancebo; N Calaf; A Net
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Measured and predicted caloric expenditure in the acutely ill.

Authors:  S Mann; D R Westenskow; B A Houtchens
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  2 in total

1.  Estimation of cardiac index by means of the arterial and the mixed venous oxygen content and pulmonary oxygen uptake determination in the early post-operative period following surgery of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  G Buheitel; J Scharf; M Hofbeck; H Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Effect of measurement errors on cardiac output calculated with O2 and modified CO2 Fick methods.

Authors:  C K Mahutte; M B Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1995-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.