Literature DB >> 2468745

Randomized clinical trial comparing mitoxantrone with doxorubicin in previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

I C Henderson1, J C Allegra, T Woodcock, S Wolff, S Bryan, K Cartwright, G Dukart, D Henry.   

Abstract

Three hundred twenty-five women with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the breast who had failed one prior chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced disease were randomized to receive 14 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone or 75 mg/m2 of doxorubicin intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks. Enrollment was closed on October 31, 1984, after 165 patients were randomized to mitoxantrone and 160 patients to doxorubicin. Patients randomized to the two treatment groups were compared for response rate, duration of response, time to progression or death, time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival. The response rate to mitoxantrone was 20.6%, to doxorubicin 29.3% (P = .07). The median response duration was 151 days for the mitoxantrone group and 126 days for the doxorubicin group (P = .16). The median TTF was 70 days in the mitoxantrone group and 104 days in the doxorubicin group (P = .36). The median survival of patients initially randomized to receive mitoxantrone was 273 days; for doxorubicin 268 days (P = .40). There were three responses among 77 patients crossed over to mitoxantrone after initial treatment with doxorubicin. The major dose-limiting toxicity for both drugs was leukopenia. There was significantly less severe and less frequent toxicity with mitoxantrone administration. Severe nausea and vomiting occurred in 9.5% of mitoxantrone patients and 25.3% of doxorubicin patients (P less than .001). The incidence of severe stomatitis and mucositis was 0.6% in the mitoxantrone group and 8.4% in the doxorubicin group (P = .001). Severe alopecia occurred in 5.1% of mitoxantrone patients and 61.0% of doxorubicin patients (P less than .001). A life-table comparison of the cumulative dose to the development of a cardiac event showed that mitoxantrone had significantly less cardiotoxicity than doxorubicin (P = .0005). This study demonstrates that mitoxantrone is active as a single agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Compared with doxorubicin it appears to be marginally less active and significantly less toxic. We conclude that mitoxantrone can be used alone or with other standard drugs to palliate the symptoms of metastatic breast cancer, especially in settings where drug toxicity is an important consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2468745     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.5.560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  55 in total

Review 1.  Systemic therapy of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  H T Mouridsen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Rechallenging with anthracyclines and taxanes in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Carlo Palmieri; Jonathan Krell; Colin R James; Catherine Harper-Wynne; Vivek Misra; Susan Cleator; David Miles
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Monitoring chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity: role of cardiac nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Gurusher Singh Panjrath; Diwakar Jain
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Idarubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  L M Hollingshead; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Cardiotoxicity of kinase inhibitors: the prediction and translation of preclinical models to clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas Force; Kyle L Kolaja
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 6.  Mitoxantrone. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of hormone-resistant advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Cardio-Oncology: A Focused Review of Anthracycline-, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Inhibitor-, and Radiation-Induced Cardiotoxicity and Management.

Authors:  Jean Domercant; Nichole Polin; Eiman Jahangir
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2016

Review 8.  Pharmacogenomics as a risk mitigation strategy for chemotherapeutic cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Brian C Jensen; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.533

9.  Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis.

Authors:  M Katano; M Nakamura; T Matsuo; A Iyama; T Hisatsugu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 10.  [Current developments in use of docetaxel (taxotere) in gynecologic oncology].

Authors:  C Jackisch
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.