Literature DB >> 7642709

The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores.

C L Rieder1, R W Cole, A Khodjakov, G Sluder.   

Abstract

During mitosis in Ptk1 cells anaphase is not initiated until, on average, 23 +/- 1 min after the last monooriented chromosome acquires a bipolar attachment to the spindle--an event that may require 3 h (Rieder, C. L., A. Schultz, R. W. Cole, and G. Sluder. 1994. J. Cell Biol. 127:1301-1310). To determine the nature of this cell-cycle checkpoint signal, and its site of production, we followed PtK1 cells by video microscopy prior to and after destroying specific chromosomal regions by laser irradiation. The checkpoint was relieved, and cells entered anaphase, 17 +/- 1 min after the centromere (and both of its associated sister kinetochores) was destroyed on the last monooriented chromosome. Thus, the checkpoint mechanism monitors an inhibitor of anaphase produced in the centromere of monooriented chromosomes. Next, in the presence of one monooriented chromosome, we destroyed one kinetochore on a bioriented chromosome to create a second monooriented chromosome lacking an unattached kinetochore. Under this condition anaphase began in the presence of the experimentally created monooriented chromosome 24 +/- 1.5 min after the nonirradiated monooriented chromosome bioriented. This result reveals that the checkpoint signal is not generated by the attached kinetochore of a monooriented chromosome or throughout the centromere volume. Finally, we selectively destroyed the unattached kinetochore on the last monooriented chromosome. Under this condition cells entered anaphase 20 +/- 2.5 min after the operation, without congressing the irradiated chromosome. Correlative light microscopy/elctron microscopy of these cells in anaphase confirmed the absence of a kinetochore on the unattached chromatid. Together, our data reveal that molecules in or near the unattached kinetochore of a monooriented PtK1 chromosome inhibit the metaphase-anaphase transition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7642709      PMCID: PMC2199954          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.130.4.941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  32 in total

1.  Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis. I. Formation and breakdown of the mitotic apparatus.

Authors:  U P Roos
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Laser microirradiation of kinetochores in mitotic PtK2 cells: chromatid separation and micronucleus formation.

Authors:  S L Brenner; L H Liaw; M W Berns
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1980-06

Review 3.  Thick and thin serial sectioning for the three-dimensional reconstruction of biological ultrastructure.

Authors:  C L Rieder
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.441

4.  Directed movement of chromosome arms and fragments in mitotic newt lung cells using optical scissors and optical tweezers.

Authors:  H Liang; W H Wright; C L Rieder; E D Salmon; G Profeta; J Andrews; Y Liu; G J Sonek; M W Berns
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  The laser microbeam as a probe for chromatin structure and function.

Authors:  M W Berns
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.441

6.  Laser microsurgery in cell and developmental biology.

Authors:  M W Berns; J Aist; J Edwards; K Strahs; J Girton; P McNeill; J B Rattner; M Kitzes; M Hammer-Wilson; L H Liaw; A Siemens; M Koonce; S Peterson; S Brenner; J Burt; R Walter; P J Bryant; D van Dyk; J Coulombe; T Cahill; G S Berns
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Chromosome behavior after laser microirradiation of a single kinetochore in mitotic PtK2 cells.

Authors:  P A McNeill; M W Berns
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Light and electron microscopy of laser microirradiated chromosomes.

Authors:  J B Rattner; M W Berns
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  CENP-C is required for maintaining proper kinetochore size and for a timely transition to anaphase.

Authors:  J Tomkiel; C A Cooke; H Saitoh; R L Bernat; W C Earnshaw
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 10.  Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle.

Authors:  C L Rieder; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  278 in total

1.  The consequences of a non-uniform tension across kinetochores: lessons from segregation of chromosomes in the permanent translocation heterozygote Oenothera.

Authors:  Z Hejnowicz; L J Feldman
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Bub3 interaction with Mad2, Mad3 and Cdc20 is mediated by WD40 repeats and does not require intact kinetochores.

Authors:  R Fraschini; A Beretta; L Sironi; A Musacchio; G Lucchini; S Piatti
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-12-03       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Evidence that replication fork components catalyze establishment of cohesion between sister chromatids.

Authors:  D R Carson; M F Christman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Microtubule-dependent changes in assembly of microtubule motor proteins and mitotic spindle checkpoint proteins at PtK1 kinetochores.

Authors:  D B Hoffman; C G Pearson; T J Yen; B J Howell; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Control of microtubule dynamics by Stu2p is essential for spindle orientation and metaphase chromosome alignment in yeast.

Authors:  K A Kosco; C G Pearson; P S Maddox; P J Wang; I R Adams; E D Salmon; K Bloom; T C Huffaker
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Spindle checkpoint requires Mad1-bound and Mad1-free Mad2.

Authors:  Eunah Chung; Rey-Huei Chen
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Visualization of Mad2 dynamics at kinetochores, along spindle fibers, and at spindle poles in living cells.

Authors:  B J Howell; D B Hoffman; G Fang; A W Murray; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09-18       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Identification of a MAD2-binding protein, CMT2, and its role in mitosis.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Habu; Sang Hoon Kim; Jasminder Weinstein; Tomohiro Matsumoto
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Mad2 and BubR1 function in a single checkpoint pathway that responds to a loss of tension.

Authors:  Katie B Shannon; Julie C Canman; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Mammalian mad2 and bub1/bubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints.

Authors:  D A Skoufias; P R Andreassen; F B Lacroix; L Wilson; R L Margolis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.