Literature DB >> 11274370

Mammalian mad2 and bub1/bubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints.

D A Skoufias1, P R Andreassen, F B Lacroix, L Wilson, R L Margolis.   

Abstract

Metaphase checkpoint controls sense abnormalities of chromosome alignment during mitosis and prevent progression to anaphase until proper alignment has been attained. A number of proteins, including mad2, bub1, and bubR1, have been implicated in the metaphase checkpoint control in mammalian cells. Metaphase checkpoints have been shown, in various systems, to read loss of either spindle tension or microtubule attachment at the kinetochore. Characteristically, HeLa cells arrest in metaphase in response to low levels of microtubule inhibitors that leave an intact spindle and a metaphase plate. Here we show that the arrest induced by nanomolar vinblastine correlates with loss of tension at the kinetochore, and that in response the checkpoint proteins bub1 and bubR1 are recruited to the kinetochore but mad2 is not. mad2 remains competent to respond and is recruited at higher drug doses that disrupt spindle association with the kinetochores. Further, although mad2 forms a complex with cdc20, it does not associate with bub1 or bubR1. We conclude that mammalian bub1/bubR1 and mad2 operate as elements of distinct pathways sensing tension and attachment, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11274370      PMCID: PMC31862          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.081076898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

1.  Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores.

Authors:  R H Chen; J C Waters; E D Salmon; A W Murray
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint.

Authors:  X Li; R B Nicklas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-02-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Tension-sensitive kinetochore phosphorylation and the chromosome distribution checkpoint in praying mantid spermatocytes.

Authors:  X Li; R B Nicklas
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2.

Authors:  Y Li; R Benezra
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push.

Authors:  J C Waters; R V Skibbens; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Mitotic block in HeLa cells by vinblastine: ultrastructural changes in kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in centrosomes.

Authors:  K L Wendell; L Wilson; M A Jordan
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle.

Authors:  C L Rieder; A Schultz; R Cole; G Sluder
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Dynamic elastic behavior of alpha-satellite DNA domains visualized in situ in living human cells.

Authors:  R D Shelby; K M Hahn; K F Sullivan
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Human BUBR1 is a mitotic checkpoint kinase that monitors CENP-E functions at kinetochores and binds the cyclosome/APC.

Authors:  G K Chan; S A Jablonski; V Sudakin; J C Hittle; T J Yen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-09-06       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores.

Authors:  C L Rieder; R W Cole; A Khodjakov; G Sluder
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  99 in total

1.  Emi1 regulates the anaphase-promoting complex by a different mechanism than Mad2 proteins.

Authors:  J D Reimann; B E Gardner; F Margottin-Goguet; P K Jackson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex.

Authors:  Guowei Fang
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  Identification of a MAD2-binding protein, CMT2, and its role in mitosis.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Habu; Sang Hoon Kim; Jasminder Weinstein; Tomohiro Matsumoto
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Mad2 and BubR1 function in a single checkpoint pathway that responds to a loss of tension.

Authors:  Katie B Shannon; Julie C Canman; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Laterally attached kinetochores recruit the checkpoint protein Bub1, but satisfy the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Michelle M Shimogawa; Megan M Wargacki; Eric G Muller; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  MTBP plays a crucial role in mitotic progression and chromosome segregation.

Authors:  N Agarwal; Y Tochigi; A S Adhikari; S Cui; Y Cui; T Iwakuma
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 7.  The spindle checkpoint: a quality control mechanism which ensures accurate chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Stephen S Taylor; Maria I F Scott; Andrew J Holland
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 8.  SUMO modification of DNA topoisomerase II: trying to get a CENse of it all.

Authors:  Ming-Ta Lee; Jeff Bachant
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-02-20

9.  Elevated level of spindle checkprotein MAD2 correlates with cellular mitotic arrest, but not with aneuploidy and clinicopathological characteristics in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chew-Wun Wu; Chin-Wen Chi; Tze-Sing Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Yeast kinetochores do not stabilize Stu2p-dependent spindle microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Chad G Pearson; Paul S Maddox; Ted R Zarzar; E D Salmon; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.