Literature DB >> 7639579

Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients.

V W Fazio1, Y Ziv, J M Church, J R Oakley, I C Lavery, J W Milsom, T K Schroeder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become an established surgery for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.
PURPOSE: The authors report the results of an 11-year experience of restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA at a tertiary referral center.
METHODS: Chart review was performed for 1005 patients undergoing IPAA from 1983 through 1993. Preoperative histopathologic diagnoses were ulcerative colitis (n = 858), familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 62), indeterminate colitis (n = 75), and miscellaneous (n = 10). Information was obtained regarding patient demographics, type and duration of diseases, previous operations, and indications for surgery. Data were collected on surgical procedure and postoperative pathologic diagnosis. Early (within 30 days after surgery) and late complications were noted. Follow-up included an annual function and quality-of-life questionnaire, physical examination, and biopsies of the pouch and anal transitional zone.
RESULTS: Of the 1005 patients (455 women), postoperative histopathologic diagnoses were as follows: ulcerative colitis (n = 812), familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 62), indeterminate colitis (n = 54), Crohn's disease (n = 67), and miscellaneous (n = 10). During a mean follow-up time of 35 months (range 1-125 months), histopathologic diagnoses were changed for 25 patients. The overall mortality rate was 1% (n = 10 patients, early = 4, late = 6); one death (0.1%) was related to pouch necrosis and sepsis. The overall morbidity rate was 62.7% (1218 complications in 630 patients; early, n = 27.5%; late, n = 50.5%). Septic complication and reoperation rates were 6.8% and 24%, respectively. The ileal pouch was removed in 34 patients (3.4%), and it is nonfunctional in 11 (1%). Functional results and quality of life were good to excellent in 93% of the patients with complete data (n = 645) and are similar for patients with ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, indeterminate colitis, and Crohn's disease. Patients who underwent operations from 1983 through 1988 have similar functional results and quality of life compared with patients who underwent operations after 1988.
CONCLUSION: Restorative proctocolectomy with an IPAA is a safe procedure, with low mortality and major morbidity rates. Although total morbidity rate is appreciable, functional results generally are good and patient satisfaction is high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7639579      PMCID: PMC1234769          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199508000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  26 in total

Review 1.  Surgical options in ulcerative colitis: role of ileo-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  M R Keighley; W Kmiot
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1990-11

2.  Prospective randomized trial comparing anal function after hand sewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomy versus stapled ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy in restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  S Choen; A Tsunoda; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Loop ileostomy after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis--is it necessary?

Authors:  M C Winslet; G Barsoum; W Pringle; K Fox; M R Keighley
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Internal anal sphincter function after total abdominal colectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosal proctectomy.

Authors:  I C Lavery; W B Tuckson; K A Easley
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Pouch ileitis.

Authors:  G Zuccaro; V W Fazio; J M Church; I C Lavery; W B Ruderman; R G Farmer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Similar functional results after restorative proctocolectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and mucosal ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  J J Tjandra; V W Fazio; J M Church; J R Oakley; J W Milsom; I C Lavery
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  The ileoanal reservoir.

Authors:  S D Wexner; W D Wong; D A Rothenberger; S M Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir: indications and results.

Authors:  R J Nicholls
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1990-04-07

9.  Pouchitis and extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  J L Lohmuller; J H Pemberton; R R Dozois; D Ilstrup; J van Heerden
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation.

Authors:  W Tuckson; I Lavery; V Fazio; J Oakley; J Church; J Milsom
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  242 in total

Review 1.  A review of the management of small bowel obstruction. Members of the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study (SCAR).

Authors:  M S Wilson; H Ellis; D Menzies; B J Moran; M C Parker; J N Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Reconstruction for chronic dysfunction of ileoanal pouches.

Authors:  E W Fonkalsrud; J Bustorff-Silva
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Functional outcome of stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis versus handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  N Saigusa; T Kurahashi; T Nakamura; H Sugimura; S Baba; H Konno; S Nakamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Medical management of postoperative complications of inflammatory bowel disease: pouchitis and Crohn's disease recurrence.

Authors:  J P Achkar; B Shen
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-12

5.  Comparison of ileoanal pouch and rectal function measured by barostat.

Authors:  J Steens; C Penning; W A Bemelman; G Griffioen; R A Van Hogezand; W J Meijerink; C B Lamers; A A Masclee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and ileoanal pouch procedure with and without protective ileostomy.

Authors:  P Kienle; J Weitz; A Benner; C Herfarth; J Schmidt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Functional outcome and quality of life following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in Indians.

Authors:  Uday Somashekar; Subash Gupta; Arvinder Soin; Samiran Nundy
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  When Not to Pouch: Important Considerations for Patient Selection for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.

Authors:  Shannon Chang; Bo Shen; Feza Remzi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-08

9.  Perioperative blood transfusions increase infectious complications after ileoanal pouch procedures (IPAA).

Authors:  Khaled M Madbouly; Anthony J Senagore; Feza H Remzi; Conor P Delaney; Jonathan Waters; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The fate of the rectal stump after subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  G Böhm; S T O'Dwyer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.