Literature DB >> 2153008

The ileoanal reservoir.

S D Wexner1, W D Wong, D A Rothenberger, S M Goldberg.   

Abstract

One hundred nine men and 71 women with a mean age of 31 years had construction of 164 S, 2 J, and 14 other ileoanal reservoirs. Postoperative gastrointestinal complications included small bowel obstruction in 11 percent and ileus, hemorrhage, and sepsis in 6 percent, 5 percent, and 11 percent, respectively. There was a 13 percent incidence of miscellaneous postoperative complications. Pouch perianal fistulas developed in 5 percent of patients, and pouch vaginal and other pouch fistulas developed in an additional 4 percent. During long-term follow-up, small bowel obstruction developed in 27 percent of patients, and enterolysis or enterectomy was required in 15 percent of patients. One hundred fourteen patients who were followed for a mean length of 5 years after ileostomy closure (range 16 to 88 months) were evaluated for functional outcome. Function improved with time in 63 percent of patients and remained stable in another 33 percent; only 4 percent had long-term deterioration. Ninety-five percent of patients would again choose an ileoanal reservoir over a permanent ileostomy. This long-term assessment shows that although the ileoanal reservoir is a viable option in the management of mucosal ulcerative colitis, it should not be recommended to every patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2153008     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80625-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  20 in total

1.  Restorative proctocolectomy: the Irish experience. Irish Association of Coloproctology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1990 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Surgical treatment of chronic ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  J Stone
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-10

3.  Comparison of the functional results of ileorectostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis following total colectomy.

Authors:  A Nagy
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Functional results and visceral perception after ileo neo-rectal anastomosis in patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  G I Andriesse; H G Gooszen; M E Schipper; L M Akkermans; T J van Vroonhoven; C J van Laarhoven
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rudolf Mennigen; Wiebke Sewald; Norbert Senninger; Emile Rijcken
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Ileoneorectal anastomosis: early clinical results of a restorative procedure for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis without formation of an ileoanal pouch.

Authors:  C J van Laarhoven; G I Andriesse; M E Schipper; L M Akkermans; T J van Vroonhoven; H G Gooszen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Is age relevant to functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis?: prospective assessment of 122 cases.

Authors:  Y Takao; R Gilliland; J J Nogueras; E G Weiss; S D Wexner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Restorative proctocolectomy: the current ochsner experience.

Authors:  Shahrazad Talebinejad; Terry C Hicks; David A Margolin; Charles B Whitlow; H David Vargas; David E Beck
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

9.  Stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with resection of the anal transition zone.

Authors:  J Braun; K H Treutner; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Long-term failure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Hagit Tulchinsky; Peter R Hawley; John Nicholls
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.