Literature DB >> 10024100

Reconstruction for chronic dysfunction of ileoanal pouches.

E W Fonkalsrud1, J Bustorff-Silva.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective review was performed to determine the results after surgical reconstruction for chronic dysfunction of ileal pouch-anal procedures for ulcerative colitis and familial colonic polyposis at a university medical center.
METHODS: During the 20-year period from 1978 to 1998, 601 patients underwent colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis, familial colonic polyposis, or Hirschsprung's disease. A J pouch was used for 351 patients, a lateral pouch for 221, an S pouch for 6, and a straight pull-through for 23. Acute complications after pouch construction have been detailed in previous publications and are not included in this study. Chronic pouch stasis with diarrhea, frequency, urgency, and soiling gradually became more severe in 164 patients (27.3%), associated with pouch enlargement, an elongated efferent limb, and obstruction to pouch outflow, largely related to the pouch configuration used during the authors' early clinical experience. These patients were sufficiently symptomatic to be considered for reconstruction (mean 68 months after IPAA). Transanal resection of an elongated IPAA spout was performed on 58 patients; abdominoperineal mobilization of the pouch with resection and tapering of the lower end (AP reconstruction) and ileoanal anastomosis on 83; pouch removal and new pouch construction on 7; and conversion of a straight pull-through to a pouch on 16.
RESULTS: Good long-term results (mean 7.7 years) with improvement in symptoms occurred in 98% of transanal resections, 91.5% of AP reconstructions, 86% of new pouch constructions, and 100% of conversions of a straight pull-through to a pouch. The average number of bowel movements per 24 hours at 6 months was 4.8. Complications occurred in 11.6% of reconstructed patients. Five of the 164 patients (3.1%) required eventual pouch removal and permanent ileostomy. The high rate of pouch revision in this series of patients undergoing IPAA is due to a policy of aggressive correction when patients do not experience an optimal functional result, or have a progressive worsening of their status.
CONCLUSIONS: Although occasionally a major undertaking, reconstruction of ileoanal pouches with progressive dysfunction due to large size or a long efferent limb has resulted in marked improvement in intestinal function in >93% of patients and has reduced the need for late pouch removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10024100      PMCID: PMC1191631          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199902000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  20 in total

1.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Reoperation for pouch-related complications.

Authors:  S Galandiuk; N A Scott; R R Dozois; K A Kelly; D M Ilstrup; R W Beart; B G Wolff; J H Pemberton; S Nivatvongs; R M Devine
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Reconstruction of malfunctioning ileoanal pouch procedures as an alternative to permanent ileostomy.

Authors:  E W Fonkalsrud; J D Phillips
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Significance of reservoir length in the endorectal ileal pullthrough with ileal reservoir.

Authors:  M Stelzner; E W Fonkalsrud; G Lichtenstein
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-10

4.  Surgical correction of the efferent ileal limb for disordered defaecation following restorative proctocolectomy with the S ileal reservoir.

Authors:  R J Nicholls; J M Gilbert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Long-term functional analysis of the ileoanal reservoir.

Authors:  S D Wexner; L Jensen; D A Rothenberger; W D Wong; S M Goldberg
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Total colectomy and endorectal ileal pull-through with internal ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  E W Fonkalsrud
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1980-01

7.  Reconstructive surgery for pelvic pouches.

Authors:  Z Cohen; D Smith; R McLeod
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Redo pouches: salvaging of failed ileal pouch-anal anastomoses.

Authors:  G Poggioli; F Marchetti; S Selleri; S Laureti; L Stocchi; G Gozzetti
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Anal sphincter-saving operations for chronic ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  K A Kelly
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Construction of an ileal reservoir in patients with a previous straight endorectal ileal pull-through.

Authors:  E W Fonkalsrud; M Stelzner; N McDonald
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  10 in total

1.  Tissue-engineered large intestine resembles native colon with appropriate in vitro physiology and architecture.

Authors:  Tracy C Grikscheit; Erin R Ochoa; Anthony Ramsanahie; Eben Alsberg; David Mooney; Edward E Whang; Joseph P Vacanti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Long-term outcome 10 years or more after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Christine Leowardi; Ulf Hinz; Mirjam Tariverdian; Peter Kienle; Christian Herfarth; Alexis Ulrich; Martina Kadmon
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  How I do it: the stapled ileal J pouch at restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  S T Martin; R Tevlin; A Heeney; C Peirce; J M Hyland; D C Winter
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.

Authors:  Alex Kartheuser; Pierre Stangherlin; Dimitri Brandt; Christophe Remue; Christine Sempoux
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Transabdominal re-do pouch surgery in pediatric patients for failed ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a case matched study.

Authors:  Erman Aytac; Eren Esen; H Hande Aydinli; Hasan T Kirat; David M Schwartzberg; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Characterization of megapouch in patients with restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Preeti Shashi; Bo Shen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Reoperative inflammatory bowel disease surgery.

Authors:  Rowena L Ramirez; Phillip Fleshner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

Review 8.  Ileal pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Simon P Bach; Neil J Mortensen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Current Approaches to Pediatric Polyposis Syndromes.

Authors:  Aodhnait S Fahy; Christopher R Moir
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2018-02-25

Review 10.  Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications.

Authors:  Kheng-Seong Ng; Simon Joseph Gonsalves; Peter Michael Sagar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.