Literature DB >> 11330405

Comparison of ileoanal pouch and rectal function measured by barostat.

J Steens1, C Penning, W A Bemelman, G Griffioen, R A Van Hogezand, W J Meijerink, C B Lamers, A A Masclee.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare pouch and rectal sensory and motor characteristics and to assess the influence of a meal on pouch tone and motility. Fifteen patients with an ileoanal J-pouch, with adequate pouch function and 12 healthy controls were studied. Visceral compliance was assessed using an electronic barostat by a pressure distension procedure, during which also sensitivity was scored by visual analog scales (VAS). The response to a meal was assessed during set pressure. Pouch and rectal compliance were not significantly different (9.3+/-0.7 vs 10.6+/-1.1 ml/mm Hg). VAS score for urge at 28 mm Hg was reduced in patients: 2.4+/-0.5 cm vs 4.7+/-0.9 cm in controls (P < 0.05). The postprandial decrease in intra-bag volume was more pronounced in patients (44+/-11%) than in controls (9+/-6%, P < 0.01). Postprandial phasic contractions were also more pronounced in patients. In conclusion, compliance is not significantly different between ileoanal pouch and rectum; differences in sensitivity reach significance only at high pressure. Significant differences were especially observed in the postprandial state with an increase in tone and frequency of phasic contractions in pouch patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11330405     DOI: 10.1023/a:1010731813255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  23 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease after surgery.

Authors:  R S McLeod; N N Baxter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Standardization of barostat procedures for testing smooth muscle tone and sensory thresholds in the gastrointestinal tract. The Working Team of Glaxo-Wellcome Research, UK.

Authors:  W E Whitehead; M Delvaux
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Pouch size: the important functional determinant after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  T Oresland; S Fasth; S Nordgren; S Akervall; L Hultén
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Ambulatory pouch and anal motility in patients with ileo-anal reservoirs.

Authors:  M D Levitt; M A Kamm; J R van der Sijp; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Comparative intrinsic and extrinsic compliance characteristics of S, J, and W ileoanal pouches.

Authors:  M L Thayer; R D Madoff; D M Jacobs; M P Bubrick
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Differential 5-HT3 mediation of human gastrocolonic response and colonic peristaltic reflex.

Authors:  E S Björnsson; W D Chey; U Ladabaum; M L Woods; F G Hooper; C Owyang; W L Hasler
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1998-09

7.  Radioimmunoassay of cholecystokinin in human tissue and plasma.

Authors:  J B Jansen; C B Lamers
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1983-07-15       Impact factor: 3.786

8.  Motor determinants of incontinence after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  A Ferrara; J H Pemberton; R L Grotz; R B Hanson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Rectal wall contractility in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic severe constipation.

Authors:  R L Grotz; J H Pemberton; K E Levin; A M Bell; R B Hanson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results.

Authors:  J H Pemberton; K A Kelly; R W Beart; R R Dozois; B G Wolff; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.