Literature DB >> 1531399

Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients.

G M Larson1, G C Vitale, J Casey, J S Evans, G Gilliam, L Heuser, G McGee, M Rao, M J Scherm, C R Voyles.   

Abstract

We analyzed the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients from a variety of practice settings in order to evaluate a large, cross-sectional experience for this new procedure. Twenty general surgeons from 9 clinics in 4 states examined the records and outcome of their laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients through March 1991. In 88 patients (4.5%), the operation was converted to an open procedure, usually because of marked inflammation and unclear anatomy. A total of 644 cases were performed with laser dissection and 1,339 with cautery, and the results of these 2 methods were similar. There were 41 complications. Reoperation for repair was necessary in 18 patients, including 5 with common duct injuries, and, to date, the outcome has been good in each patient. Seventy-six patients (3.8%) have had recognized common duct stones; these were removed preoperatively by endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERS) in 20 patients, during cholecystectomy in 46 patients, and postoperatively by ERS in 4 patients. In six patients, common duct stones became apparent 1 to 4 months after cholecystectomy. We conclude that trained general surgeons can perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy safely with risks comparable to those for conventional open cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1531399     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90105-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  64 in total

1.  Brush dissection technique in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Ohashi; E Taniguchi; S Takiguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Litigious consequences of open and laparoscopic biliary surgical mishaps.

Authors:  J G Chandler; C R Voyles; T L Floore; L A Bartholomew
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Confirmation of a "safety zone" by intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K Ido; N Isoda; C Kawamoto; T Suzuki; T Ioka; N Nagamine; Y Taniguchi; M Kumagai; K Kimura
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L Demoulin; K Kesteloot; F Penninckx
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy demonstrated with 99mTc-PMT hepatobiliary scintigraphy.

Authors:  M Oshima; H Yasukochi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.668

7.  Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D P McKellar; R M Johnson; J A Dutro; J Mellinger; W A Bernie; J B Peoples
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Urgent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in a district general hospital - is it feasible?

Authors:  M N Khan; I Nordon; A S K Ghauri; C Ranaboldo; N Carty
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  P H Davids; J Ringers; E A Rauws; L T de Wit; K Huibregtse; M N van der Heyde; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Initial experience.

Authors:  G C Hoffman; J W Baker; C W Fitchett; J H Vansant
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.