Literature DB >> 7637858

Spatial characteristics of thematic role representation.

A Chatterjee1, L M Maher, K M Heilman.   

Abstract

Humans use language to describe actions by mapping the thematic roles of agent (doer of actions) and patient (recipient of actions) on the grammatical categories of subject and object. The extent to which thematic roles can be conceptualized independent of language is not known. If nonlinguistic conceptualization of thematic roles is possible, then representation of these roles would evidence nonlinguistic characteristics. Motivated by observations in an aphasic man, we wished to learn if thematic roles are conceptualized spatially. Normally subjects were asked to draw stick figures depicting the thematic roles of agent and patient. They demonstrated a systematic spatial bias in locating agents to the left of where they located patients. This bias, somewhat mitigated by ordering effects of motor output and auditory input, was brought into clearest focus when subjects depicted thematic roles in a context stripped of surface sentential form. These data imply that, in their nascent form, the thematic roles of agent and patient are spatially represented prior to being projected on grammar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7637858     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)00134-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  14 in total

1.  Off-line sentence processing: what is involved in answering a comprehension probe?

Authors:  Sharlene D Newman; Donghoon Lee; Kristen L Ratliff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Prediction, events, and the advantage of agents: the processing of semantic roles in visual narrative.

Authors:  Neil Cohn; Martin Paczynski
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Exploratory examination of lexical and neuroanatomic correlates of neglect dyslexia.

Authors:  Olga Boukrina; Peii Chen; Tamara Budinoska; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  The effect of semantic relatedness on syntactic analysis: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Sharlene D Newman; Toshikazu Ikuta; Thomas Burns
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Disembodying cognition.

Authors:  Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Lang Cogn       Date:  2010-05

6.  A sinister bias for calling fouls in soccer.

Authors:  Alexander Kranjec; Matthew Lehet; Bianca Bromberger; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Agency and the Annunciation.

Authors:  Lealani Mae Y Acosta; John B Williamson; Kenneth M Heilman
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2014-12

8.  Is it what you see, or how you say it? Spatial bias in young and aged subjects.

Authors:  Anna M Barrett; Catherine E Craver-Lemley
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  The Influence of Language on Spatial Reasoning: Reading Habits Modulate the Formulation of Conclusions and the Integration of Premises.

Authors:  Thomas Castelain; Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-17

10.  Exploring the relationship between semantics and space.

Authors:  Patrizia Turriziani; Massimiliano Oliveri; Sonia Bonnì; Giacomo Koch; Daniela Smirni; Lisa Cipolotti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.