Literature DB >> 19184993

Off-line sentence processing: what is involved in answering a comprehension probe?

Sharlene D Newman1, Donghoon Lee, Kristen L Ratliff.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to better characterize the influence of the comprehension probe on syntax-related activation patterns observed in fMRI studies of sentence comprehension. In this study, sentence comprehension was assessed by presenting a true/false statement after each sentence. To disassociate the sentence reading from the comprehension probe activation, a 6-s delay was placed between these processing phases. Two factors were manipulated, one affected the sentence and the other affected the probe. The sentences were manipulated by varying their syntactic complexity; conjoined-active and object-relative sentences were examined. The comprehension probes asked whether one of the first two mentioned nouns in the preceding sentence performed the action of one of the two verbs. The probes were manipulated by varying the distance (number of intervening words) between the noun and verb within the sentence; there were three probe types: short distance, long distance, and false statements. The results, which focused on the processing taking place during the probe, showed that the distance manipulation resulted in significant differences in both behavioral and brain activation measures. This was particularly true of BA 44, which revealed an interaction between complexity and distance such that the complexity effect was all but eliminated for the long-distance condition. Additionally, we replicated our previous finding of syntactic complexity effects during the probe phase. Finally, post hoc analysis revealed that participants used two distinct strategies during sentence reading; significant effects of strategy use on both behavioral and brain activation data were observed. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19184993      PMCID: PMC6870822          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  49 in total

1.  Updating working memory for words: a PET activation study.

Authors:  C R Clark; G F Egan; A C McFarlane; P Morris; D Weber; C Sonkkilla; J Marcina; H J Tochon-Danguy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  A comment on the functional localization of the phonological storage subsystem of working memory.

Authors:  J T Becker; D K MacAndrew; J A Fiez
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  fMRI investigation of sentence comprehension by eye and by ear: modality fingerprints on cognitive processes.

Authors:  E B Michael; T A Keller; P A Carpenter; M A Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici; Shirley-Ann Rüschemeyer; Anja Hahne; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  The neural reality of syntactic transformations: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Michal Ben-Shachar; Talma Hendler; Itamar Kahn; Dafna Ben-Bashat; Yosef Grodzinsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

6.  Impact of modality and linguistic complexity during reading and listening tasks.

Authors:  G Jobard; M Vigneau; B Mazoyer; N Tzourio-Mazoyer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici; Christian J Fiebach; Matthias Schlesewsky; Ina D Bornkessel; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  D Caplan; N Alpert; G Waters
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The role of parietal cortex in verbal working memory.

Authors:  J Jonides; E H Schumacher; E E Smith; R A Koeppe; E Awh; P A Reuter-Lorenz; C Marshuetz; C R Willis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Neural substrates of action event knowledge.

Authors:  Joseph W Kable; Jessica Lease-Spellmeyer; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  7 in total

1.  The effect of presentation paradigm on syntactic processing: An event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  Donghoon Lee; Sharlene D Newman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The regional neuronal activity in left posterior middle temporal gyrus is correlated with the severity of chronic aphasia.

Authors:  Jianlin Li; Dunren Du; Wei Gao; Xichun Sun; Haizhu Xie; Gang Zhang; Jian Li; Honglun Li; Kefeng Li
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.570

3.  The effect of semantic relatedness on syntactic analysis: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Sharlene D Newman; Toshikazu Ikuta; Thomas Burns
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  The effect of individual differences in working memory capacity on sentence comprehension: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Sharlene D Newman; Evie Malaia; Roy Seo; Hu Cheng
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  As Time Goes by: A rTMS Study on Age-Related Changes in Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Manuela Berlingeri; Desiré Carioti; Laura Danelli; Emanuele Lo Gerfo
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Effect of Distance between Marker Agreement Dependencies on Sentence Comprehension in Persons with Aphasia.

Authors:  H S Darshan; S P Goswami
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.383

7.  Large scale brain functional networks support sentence comprehension: evidence from both explicit and implicit language tasks.

Authors:  Zude Zhu; Yuanyuan Fan; Gangyi Feng; Ruiwang Huang; Suiping Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.