Literature DB >> 7629432

Chromatin structure and radiation-induced DNA strand breaks in human cells: soluble scavengers and DNA-bound proteins offer a better protection against single- than double-strand breaks.

J Nygren1, M Ljungman, G Ahnström.   

Abstract

In the present investigation we have studied the formation of DNA double-strand breaks (dsbs) in different chromatin substrates and made a comparison with our previous results on radiation-induced single-strand breaks (ssb). Removal of soluble scavengers increased the number of ssbs by a factor of 2, but increased dsbs only 1.2 times. Decondensation of the chromatin increased ssbs and dsbs to the same extent, by a factor of 3-4. Removal of DNA-bound proteins gave an additional increase in ssbs and dsbs by a factor of 14 and 5 respectively. The increase in both ssbs and dsbs was caused by OH radicals. The differential effect on ssbs and dsbs can be explained by assuming that dsbs are formed mainly by multiple hits from clusters of ionizations close to the DNA. When the DNA-bound proteins are removed, more distant radicals can reach the DNA, which favours ssb formation. Under those conditions dsbs also induced by single OH radicals become important. DNA-bound proteins protect DNA only to a limited extent by acting as scavengers of OH radicals. The largest part of the protection depends on the fact that DNA in the chromatin is made up of large, compact aggregates, where the distance between separate aggregates exceeds the effective range of the OH radicals and the amount of water inside the aggregates is too small to give a maximal contribution of OH radicals compared with when DNA is more evenly distributed in a given volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7629432     DOI: 10.1080/09553009514550861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  9 in total

1.  Germ-line effects of a mutator, mu2, in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J M Mason; L E Champion; G Hook
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Influence of endogenous glutathione level on X-ray induced cell cycle delay in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  S Ray; A Chatterjee
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.831

3.  Nuclear condensation and free radical scavenging: a dual mechanism of bisbenzimidazoles to modulate radiation damage to DNA.

Authors:  Urmila Tawar; Sandhya Bansal; Shiteshu Shrimal; Manish Singh; Vibha Tandon
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 4.  First steps towards systems radiation biology studies concerned with DNA and chromosome structure within living cells.

Authors:  Werner Friedland; Herwig G Paretzke; Francesca Ballarini; Andrea Ottolenghi; Gregor Kreth; Christoph Cremer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 5.  Spatiotemporal characterization of ionizing radiation induced DNA damage foci and their relation to chromatin organization.

Authors:  S V Costes; I Chiolo; J M Pluth; M H Barcellos-Hoff; B Jakob
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Mixed secondary chromatin structure revealed by modeling radiation-induced DNA fragment length distribution.

Authors:  Wenzong Ma; Chenyang Gu; Lin Ma; Caoqi Fan; Chao Zhang; Yujie Sun; Cheng Li; Gen Yang
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 6.038

7.  The relation between microdosimetry and induction of direct damage to DNA by alpha particles.

Authors:  Alejandro Bertolet; José Ramos-Méndez; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.174

8.  Application of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy of DNA binding dyes to assess radiation-induced chromatin compaction changes.

Authors:  Elham Abdollahi; Gisela Taucher-Scholz; Burkhard Jakob
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Chromatin compaction protects genomic DNA from radiation damage.

Authors:  Hideaki Takata; Tomo Hanafusa; Toshiaki Mori; Mari Shimura; Yutaka Iida; Kenichi Ishikawa; Kenichi Yoshikawa; Yuko Yoshikawa; Kazuhiro Maeshima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.