Literature DB >> 9258681

Germ-line effects of a mutator, mu2, in Drosophila melanogaster.

J M Mason1, L E Champion, G Hook.   

Abstract

A mutator, mu2a, in Drosophila melanogaster potentiates terminal deficiencies. In the female germ line the gamma mutant frequency induced by irradiation of mature oocytes with 5 Gy increases approximately twofold in heterozygotes and 20-fold in homozygotes compared with wild type. The recovery of terminal deficiencies is not limited to breaks close to chromosome ends; high frequencies of deficiencies can be recovered with breakpoints located in centric heterochromatin or near the middle of a chromosome arm. Lesions induced by gamma-rays are repaired slowly in mu2a oocytes, but become "fixed" as terminal deficiencies upon fertilization. A few lesions induced in wild-type females also produce terminal deficiencies. Mutator males do not exhibit an increase in terminal deletions, regardless of the germ cell stage irradiated. In addition, there is no increase in the mutant frequency when mature sperm are irradiated and fertilize eggs produced by mu2a females. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that lesions induced in sperm chromosomes are repaired after fertilization, while lesions induced in oocyte chromosomes are shunted instead to a mechanism that stabilizes broken chromosome ends. We propose that mu2 affects chromosomal structure during oogenesis, thereby modulating DNA repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9258681      PMCID: PMC1208082     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  54 in total

1.  The Stability of Broken Ends of Chromosomes in Zea Mays.

Authors:  B McClintock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1941-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Chromosome ends in Drosophila without telomeric DNA sequences.

Authors:  H Biessmann; S B Carter; J M Mason
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The nature of X-ray-induced mutations in mature sperm and spermatogonial cells of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J C Eeken; A W de Jong; M Loos; C Vreeken; R Romeyn; A Pastink; P H Lohman
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Origin of concatemeric T7 DNA.

Authors:  J D Watson
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1972-10-18

5.  The unusual telomeres of Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Mason; H Biessmann
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 6.  Interchange and intra-nuclear architecture.

Authors:  J R Savage
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  The timing of the restitution of chromosome breaks induced by X-rays in the mature sperm of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R H Maddern; B Leigh
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Mutagen-sensitive mutants in Drosophila melanogaster: effects on premutational damage.

Authors:  U Graf; M M Green; F E Würgler
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  The saccharomyces PIF1 DNA helicase inhibits telomere elongation and de novo telomere formation.

Authors:  V P Schulz; V A Zakian
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-01-14       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Preferential transposition of Drosophila P elements to nearby chromosomal sites.

Authors:  J Tower; G H Karpen; N Craig; A C Spradling
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  14 in total

1.  Multiple pathways suppress telomere addition to DNA breaks in the Drosophila germline.

Authors:  Michelle Beaucher; Xiao-Feng Zheng; Flavia Amariei; Yikang S Rong
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Drosophila telomeres: an exception providing new insights.

Authors:  James M Mason; Radmila Capkova Frydrychova; Harald Biessmann
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Healing of euchromatic chromosome breaks by efficient de novo telomere addition in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Simon W A Titen; Kent G Golic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The mechanism of telomere protection: a comparison between Drosophila and humans.

Authors:  Giovanni Cenci; Laura Ciapponi; Maurizio Gatti
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Molecular cloning and tissue-specific expression of the mutator2 gene (mu2) in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A Kasravi; M F Walter; S Brand; J M Mason; H Biessmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Repair of chromosome ends after telomere loss in Saccharomyces.

Authors:  J L Mangahas; M K Alexander; L L Sandell; V A Zakian
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  The Ku protein complex is involved in length regulation of Drosophila telomeres.

Authors:  Larisa Melnikova; Harald Biessmann; Pavel Georgiev
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Drosophila atm/telomere fusion is required for telomeric localization of HP1 and telomere position effect.

Authors:  Sarah R Oikemus; Nadine McGinnis; Joana Queiroz-Machado; Hanna Tukachinsky; Saeko Takada; Claudio E Sunkel; Michael H Brodsky
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 9.  Regulation of telomere length in Drosophila.

Authors:  R Capkova Frydrychova; H Biessmann; J M Mason
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.636

10.  Recognition of double strand breaks by a mutator protein (MU2) in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Raghuvar Dronamraju; James M Mason
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.