Literature DB >> 20060491

Spatiotemporal characterization of ionizing radiation induced DNA damage foci and their relation to chromatin organization.

S V Costes1, I Chiolo, J M Pluth, M H Barcellos-Hoff, B Jakob.   

Abstract

DNA damage sensing proteins have been shown to localize to the sites of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) within seconds to minutes following ionizing radiation (IR) exposure, resulting in the formation of microscopically visible nuclear domains referred to as radiation-induced foci (RIF). This review characterizes the spatiotemporal properties of RIF at physiological doses, minutes to hours following exposure to ionizing radiation, and it proposes a model describing RIF formation and resolution as a function of radiation quality and chromatin territories. Discussion is limited to RIF formed by three interrelated proteins ATM (Ataxia telangiectasia mutated), 53BP1 (p53 binding protein 1) and gammaH2AX (phosphorylated variant histone H2AX), with an emphasis on the later. This review discusses the importance of not equating RIF with DSB in all situations and shows how dose and time dependence of RIF frequency is inconsistent with a one to one equivalence. Instead, we propose that RIF mark regions of the chromatin that would serve as scaffolds rigid enough to keep broken DNA from diffusing away, but open enough to allow the repair machinery to access the damage site. We review data indicating clear kinetic and physical differences between RIF emerging from dense and uncondensed regions of the nucleus. We suggest that persistent RIF observed days following exposure to ionizing radiation are nuclear marks of permanent rearrangement of the chromatin architecture. Such chromatin alterations may not always lead to growth arrest as cells have been shown to replicate these in progeny. Thus, heritable persistent RIF spanning over tens of Mbp may reflect persistent changes in the transcriptome of a large progeny of cells. Such model opens the door to a "non-DNA-centric view" of radiation-induced phenotypes. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20060491      PMCID: PMC3951968          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  75 in total

1.  Dynamics of relative chromosome position during the cell cycle.

Authors:  Jeroen Essers; Wiggert A van Cappellen; Arjan F Theil; Ellen van Drunen; Nicolaas G J Jaspers; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Claire Wyman; Wim Vermeulen; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 2.  DNA repair: the importance of phosphorylating histone H2AX.

Authors:  Noel F Lowndes; Geraldine W-L Toh
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  ATM signaling and 53BP1.

Authors:  Omar Zgheib; Yentram Huyen; Richard A DiTullio; Andrew Snyder; Monica Venere; Elena S Stavridi; Thanos D Halazonetis
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Joining of correct and incorrect DNA ends at double-strand breaks produced by high-linear energy transfer radiation in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  M Löbrich; P K Cooper; B Rydberg
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  B E Nelms; R S Maser; J F MacKay; M G Lagally; J H Petrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-04-24       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Immunofluorescence detection of clustered gamma-H2AX foci induced by HZE-particle radiation.

Authors:  N Desai; E Davis; P O'Neill; M Durante; F A Cucinotta; H Wu
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Cell cycle dependence of DNA-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation in response to DNA double strand breaks.

Authors:  Benjamin P C Chen; Doug W Chan; Junya Kobayashi; Sandeep Burma; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Keiko Morotomi-Yano; Elliot Botvinick; Jun Qin; David J Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Yentram Huyen; Omar Zgheib; Richard A Ditullio; Vassilis G Gorgoulis; Panayotis Zacharatos; Tom J Petty; Emily A Sheston; Hestia S Mellert; Elena S Stavridi; Thanos D Halazonetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  ATM-dependent DNA damage-independent mitotic phosphorylation of H2AX in normally growing mammalian cells.

Authors:  Kirk J McManus; Michael J Hendzel
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo.

Authors:  E P Rogakou; C Boon; C Redon; W M Bonner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-09-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  72 in total

1.  Evidence for formation of DNA repair centers and dose-response nonlinearity in human cells.

Authors:  Teresa Neumaier; Joel Swenson; Christopher Pham; Aris Polyzos; Alvin T Lo; PoAn Yang; Jane Dyball; Aroumougame Asaithamby; David J Chen; Mina J Bissell; Stefan Thalhammer; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Quantitative modeling of chronic myeloid leukemia: insights from radiobiology.

Authors:  Tomas Radivoyevitch; Lynn Hlatky; Julian Landaw; Rainer K Sachs
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Preferential localization of γH2AX foci in euchromatin of retina rod cells after DNA damage induction.

Authors:  Laura Lafon-Hughes; María Vittoria Di Tomaso; Pablo Liddle; Andrea Toledo; Ana Laura Reyes-Ábalos; Gustavo A Folle
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  DNA double-strand breaks: linking gene expression to chromosome morphology and mobility.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Dieter W Heermann
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Unrepaired clustered DNA lesions induce chromosome breakage in human cells.

Authors:  Aroumougame Asaithamby; Burong Hu; David J Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Arp2/3 and Unc45 maintain heterochromatin stability in Drosophila polytene chromosomes.

Authors:  George Dialynas; Laetitia Delabaere; Irene Chiolo
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-07-31

7.  Interconnected contribution of tissue morphogenesis and the nuclear protein NuMA to the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Vidi; Gurushankar Chandramouly; Matthew Gray; Lei Wang; Er Liu; Joseph J Kim; Vassilis Roukos; Mina J Bissell; Prabhas V Moghe; Sophie A Lelièvre
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 8.  Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure.

Authors:  Deepa M Sridharan; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Steve R Blattnig; Sylvain V Costes; Paul W Doetsch; William S Dynan; Philip Hahnfeldt; Lynn Hlatky; Yared Kidane; Amy Kronenberg; Mamta D Naidu; Leif E Peterson; Ianik Plante; Artem L Ponomarev; Janapriya Saha; Antoine M Snijders; Kalayarasan Srinivasan; Jonathan Tang; Erica Werner; Janice M Pluth
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-21

9.  Epigenetic reprogramming as a key contributor to melanocyte malignant transformation.

Authors:  Fernanda Molognoni; Adriana T Cruz; Fabiana M Meliso; Alice S Morais; Camila F Souza; Patrícia Xander; Jared M Bischof; Fabrício F Costa; Marcelo B Soares; Gangning Liang; Peter A Jones; Miriam G Jasiulionis
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.528

10.  Use of a microscope stage-mounted Nickel-63 microirradiator for real-time observation of the DNA double-strand break response.

Authors:  Zhen Cao; Wendy W Kuhne; Jennifer Steeb; Mark A Merkley; Yunfeng Zhou; Jiri Janata; William S Dynan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.