Literature DB >> 2239874

Esophageal 24-h pH monitoring: is prior manometry necessary for correct positioning of the electrode?

A G Klauser1, N E Schindlbeck, S A Müller-Lissner.   

Abstract

In 24-h esophageal pH monitoring, the electrode is usually positioned 5 cm above the manometrically localized esophagogastric junction. In order to replace esophageal manometry for this purpose, we tested whether the esophagogastric junction can be identified correctly by fluoroscopy or the determination of the pH-step between stomach and esophagus, compared with esophageal manometry. The distance from the nares to the esophagogastric junction was determined three times with each of the three methods in 46 patients and 14 volunteers. Fluoroscopy assumed the esophagogastric junction 1.23 +/- 0.23 cm (mean +/- SE) lower than the peak pressure point determined at manometry, pH-step only 0.45 +/- 0.16 cm. With pH-step, only one subject had a difference of more than 3 cm to the manometrically defined esophagogastric junction, whether gastroesophageal reflux disease (as proven by pH monitoring) was present or not. We conclude that the esophagogastric junction can usually be identified with sufficient accuracy by the measurement of the pH-step between stomach and esophagus. Fluoroscopy is far less accurate than pH-step, and should not be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2239874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  17 in total

1.  Gastroesophageal pH step-up inaccurately locates proximal border of lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  H E Mattox; J E Richter; J W Sinclair; J E Price; L D Case
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Accurate positioning of the 24-hour pH monitoring catheter: agreement between manometry and pH step-up method in two patient positions.

Authors:  Mehmet-Fatih Can; Gokhan Yagci; Sadettin Cetiner; Mustafa Gulsen; Taner Yigit; Erkan Ozturk; Semih Gorgulu; Turgut Tufan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The relationship between somatic growth and in vivo esophageal segmental and sphincteric growth in human neonates.

Authors:  Alankar Gupta; Sudarshan Rao Jadcherla
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 4.  Diagnosis of reflux disease.

Authors:  N I McDougall
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Responses to different levels of esophageal acidification during waking and sleep.

Authors:  W C Orr; L F Johnson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Treatment implications of high-resolution manometry findings: options for patients with esophageal dysmotility.

Authors:  Ahmed Bolkhir; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03

7.  The effect of famotidine on gastroesophageal and duodeno-gastro-esophageal refluxes in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Ying Xin; Ning Dai; Lan Zhao; Jian-Guo Wang; Jian-Ming Si
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Three year follow up of patients with gastrooesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  N E Schindlbeck; A G Klauser; G Berghammer; W Londong; S A Müller-Lissner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Effect of famotidine on oesophageal sensitivity in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  J M Marrero; J S de Caestecker; J D Maxwell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Esophageal pH testing in patients refractory to proton pump inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  B A Mackalski; A Ilnyckyj
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.