Literature DB >> 1740266

Alternative method of positioning the pH probe for oesophageal pH monitoring.

A Anggiansah1, N Bright, M McCullagh, K Sumboonnanonda, W J Owen.   

Abstract

The most reliable method of positioning a pH probe for oesophageal pH monitoring is to use manometry to determine the upper margin of the lower oesophageal sphincter and to place the probe 5 cm above this point. Manometry is expensive, however, requires special equipment and training, and is not widely available. An alternative cheaper way of determining the site of the lower oesophageal sphincter has been evaluated. A fine bore nasogastric tube with a latex balloon at its tip was inserted transnasally into the stomach. The balloon was inflated with 10 ml of water and the tube withdrawn until resistance was met. The distance from the nose (in cm) was noted and compared with the upper margin of the lower oesophageal sphincter as determined by oesophageal manometry. The manometric distance agreed closely with the balloon distance minus 1 cm (bias 0.29 cm; 95% CI of bias, 0.03 to 0.55 cm; 2 SD, limits of agreement, 1.58 cm). We conclude that where oesophageal manometry is not available, balloon localisation is a suitably accurate way of identifying the lower oesophageal sphincter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1740266      PMCID: PMC1373875          DOI: 10.1136/gut.33.1.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  13 in total

1.  Postprandial gastro-oesophageal reflux in healthy people.

Authors:  M D Kaye
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Observations on oesophageal length.

Authors:  G J Kalloor; A H Deshpande; J L Collis
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R Demeester
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Prolonged pH recording in the study of gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  J Spencer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Is 24 h ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring useful in a district general hospital?

Authors:  I P Donald; G A Ford; S P Wilkinson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-01-10       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Normal lower esophageal sphincter pressure: a comparison of rapid vs. slow pull-through techniques.

Authors:  R W Welch; S T Drake
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  D B Skinner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Esophageal pH assessment of gastroesophageal reflux in 18 patients and the effect of two prokinetic agents: cisapride and metoclopramide.

Authors:  H Rode; R J Stunden; A J Millar; S Cywes
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Technique, indications, and clinical use of 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; C I Wang; J A Wernly; C A Pellegrini; A G Little; P Klementschitsch; G Bermudez; L F Johnson; D B Skinner
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  3 in total

1.  Accurate positioning of the 24-hour pH monitoring catheter: agreement between manometry and pH step-up method in two patient positions.

Authors:  Mehmet-Fatih Can; Gokhan Yagci; Sadettin Cetiner; Mustafa Gulsen; Taner Yigit; Erkan Ozturk; Semih Gorgulu; Turgut Tufan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Simultaneous two-level esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring in patients with mild and severe esophagitis. Does probe position influence results of esophageal monitoring?

Authors:  A Ruiz-de-león; C Sevilla-Mantilla; J Pérez-de-la-Serna; C Taxonera; M Díaz Rubio
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Gastroesophageal reflux in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries: an uncommon cause of exertional chest pain.

Authors:  R A Cooke; A Anggiansah; N C Smeeton; W J Owen; J B Chambers
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.