Literature DB >> 21160008

Recurrent antitopographic inhibition mediates competitive stimulus selection in an attention network.

Dihui Lai1, Sebastian Brandt, Harald Luksch, Ralf Wessel.   

Abstract

Topographically organized neurons represent multiple stimuli within complex visual scenes and compete for subsequent processing in higher visual centers. The underlying neural mechanisms of this process have long been elusive. We investigate an experimentally constrained model of a midbrain structure: the optic tectum and the reciprocally connected nucleus isthmi. We show that a recurrent antitopographic inhibition mediates the competitive stimulus selection between distant sensory inputs in this visual pathway. This recurrent antitopographic inhibition is fundamentally different from surround inhibition in that it projects on all locations of its input layer, except to the locus from which it receives input. At a larger scale, the model shows how a focal top-down input from a forebrain region, the arcopallial gaze field, biases the competitive stimulus selection via the combined activation of a local excitation and the recurrent antitopographic inhibition. Our findings reveal circuit mechanisms of competitive stimulus selection and should motivate a search for anatomical implementations of these mechanisms in a range of vertebrate attentional systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21160008      PMCID: PMC3059176          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00673.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  80 in total

1.  Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention.

Authors:  P Fries; J H Reynolds; A E Rorie; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters.

Authors:  D K Lee; L Itti; C Koch; J Braun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Bilateral projections from the parabigeminal nucleus to the superior colliculus in monkey.

Authors:  J S Baizer; J F Whitney; D B Bender
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Stimulus-specific adaptations in the gaze control system of the barn owl.

Authors:  Amit Reches; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Three hundred million years of attentional selection.

Authors:  John Reynolds
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Localization of neuroactive substances in the rat parabigeminal nucleus: an immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  Y Q Wang; K Takatsuji; H Kiyama; M Yamano; M Tohyama
Journal:  J Chem Neuroanat       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.052

7.  Binaural tuning of auditory units in the forebrain archistriatal gaze fields of the barn owl: local organization but no space map.

Authors:  Y E Cohen; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The distribution of cholinergic neurons in the central nervous system of turtles.

Authors:  A S Powers; A Reiner
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry.

Authors:  C Koch; S Ullman
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

10.  Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes involved in facilitation of GABAergic inhibition in mouse superficial superior colliculus.

Authors:  Toshiaki Endo; Yuchio Yanagawa; Kunihiko Obata; Tadashi Isa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  10 in total

1.  Reciprocal inhibition of inhibition: a circuit motif for flexible categorization in stimulus selection.

Authors:  Shreesh P Mysore; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Selective attention without a neocortex.

Authors:  Richard J Krauzlis; Amarender R Bogadhi; James P Herman; Anil Bollimunta
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 3.  The role of a midbrain network in competitive stimulus selection.

Authors:  Shreesh P Mysore; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Rules of competitive stimulus selection in a cholinergic isthmic nucleus of the owl midbrain.

Authors:  Ali Asadollahi; Shreesh P Mysore; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Superior colliculus and visual spatial attention.

Authors:  Richard J Krauzlis; Lee P Lovejoy; Alexandre Zénon
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Responses of tectal neurons to contrasting stimuli: an electrophysiological study in the barn owl.

Authors:  Yael Zahar; Hermann Wagner; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Anatomy and Physiology of Neurons in Layer 9 of the Chicken Optic Tectum.

Authors:  Marinus Kloos; Stefan Weigel; Harald Luksch
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls.

Authors:  Tidhar Lev-Ari; Yael Zahar; Arpit Agarwal; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Visual Responses to Moving and Flashed Stimuli of Neurons in Domestic Pigeon (Columba livia domestica) Optic Tectum.

Authors:  Shuman Huang; Xiaoke Niu; Jiangtao Wang; Zhizhong Wang; Huaxing Xu; Li Shi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 10.  Saliency mapping in the optic tectum and its relationship to habituation.

Authors:  Arkadeb Dutta; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.