Literature DB >> 7615029

Effects of the spatio-temporal structure of optical flow on postural readjustments in man.

G Masson1, D R Mestre, J Pailhous.   

Abstract

How does the spatio-temporal structure of an oscillating radial optical flow affect postural stability? In order to investigate this problem, two different types of stimulus pattern were presented to human subjects. These stimuli were generated either with a constant spatial frequency or with a spatial frequency gradient providing monocular depth cues. When the stimulation was set in motion, the gain response of the antero-posterior postural changes depended upon the oscillation frequency of the visual scene. The amplitude of the postural response did not change with the amplitude of the visual scene motion. The spatial orientation of the postural sway (major axis of sway) depended strictly and solely on the structure of the visual scene. In static conditions, depth information resulting from the presence of a spatial frequency gradient enhanced postural stability. When set in motion, a visual scene with a spatial frequency gradient induced an organization of postural sway in the direction of the visual motion. Considering visual dynamic cues, postural instability depended linearly both on the logarithm of the velocity and on the logarithm of the temporal frequency. A nonlinear relationship existed between the amplitude of the fore-aft postural sway at the driving frequency and the temporal frequency, with a peak around 2-4 Hz. These results are discussed in terms of their implications for the separation of visual and biomechanical factors influencing visuo-postural control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7615029     DOI: 10.1007/BF00241971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Postural stability and stereo-ambiguity in man-designed visual environments.

Authors:  D J Lasley; R D Hamer; R Dister; T E Cohn
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Differential effects of retinal target displacement, changing size and changing disparity in the control of anterior/posterior and lateral body sway.

Authors:  W Paulus; A Straube; S Krafczyk; T Brandt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spatial orientation from optic flow in the central visual field.

Authors:  G J Andersen; B P Dyre
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-05

4.  Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance.

Authors:  T A Stoffregen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Postural movements induced by rotations of visual scenes.

Authors:  W N van Asten; C C Gielen; J J van der Gon
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: a hypothesis.

Authors:  K Nakayama; J M Loomis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Peripheral motion detection and refractive error.

Authors:  H W Leibowitz; C A Johnson; E Isabelle
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A model describing vestibular detection of body sway motion.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories.

Authors:  J J Collins; C J De Luca
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces.

Authors:  J E Cutting; R T Millard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-06
View more
  10 in total

1.  Decreasing perceived optic flow rigidity increases postural sway.

Authors:  Vivian Holten; Stella F Donker; Frans A J Verstraten; Maarten J van der Smagt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Brief report: postural reactivity to fast visual motion differentiates autistic from children with Asperger syndrome.

Authors:  Bruno Gepner; Daniel R Mestre
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2002-06

3.  Influence of visual scene velocity on segmental kinematics during stance.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Lack of motor prediction, rather than perceptual conflict, evokes an odd sensation upon stepping onto a stopped escalator.

Authors:  Hiroaki Gomi; Takeshi Sakurada; Takao Fukui
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Chaos in balance: non-linear measures of postural control predict individual variations in visual illusions of motion.

Authors:  Deborah Apthorp; Fintan Nagle; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Interaction effects of visual stimulus speed and contrast on postural sway.

Authors:  Vivian Holten; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten; Stella F Donker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual Fixations and Motion Sensitivity: Protocol for an Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Shikha Chaudhary; Nicola Saywell; Arun Kumar; Denise Taylor
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2020-07-27

Review 8.  The Differentiation of Self-Motion From External Motion Is a Prerequisite for Postural Control: A Narrative Review of Visual-Vestibular Interaction.

Authors:  Shikha Chaudhary; Nicola Saywell; Denise Taylor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Visually induced postural reactivity is velocity-dependent at low temporal frequencies and frequency-dependent at high temporal frequencies.

Authors:  J-M Hanssens; R Allard; G Giraudet; J Faubert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Inter-trial phase coherence of visually evoked postural responses in virtual reality.

Authors:  David Engel; Adrian Schütz; Milosz Krala; Jakob C B Schwenk; Adam P Morris; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.