Literature DB >> 23660741

Decreasing perceived optic flow rigidity increases postural sway.

Vivian Holten1, Stella F Donker, Frans A J Verstraten, Maarten J van der Smagt.   

Abstract

Optic flow simulating self-motion through the environment can induce postural adjustments in observers. Some studies investigating this phenomenon have used optic flow patterns increasing in speed from center to periphery, whereas others used optic flow patterns with a constant speed. However, altering the speed gradient of an optic flow stimulus changes the perceived rigidity of such a stimulus. Optic flow stimuli that are perceived as rigid can be expected to provide a stronger sensation of self-motion than non-rigid optic flow, and this may well be reflected in the amount of postural sway. The current study, therefore, examined, by manipulating the speed gradient, to what extent the rigidity of an optic flow stimulus influences posture along the anterior-posterior axis. We used radial random dot expanding or contracting optic flow patterns with three different speed profiles (single-speed, linear speed gradient or quadratic speed gradient) that differentially induce the sensation of self-motion. Interestingly, most postural sway was observed for the non-rigid single-speed optic flow pattern, which contained the least self-motion information of the three profiles. Moreover, we found an anisotropy in that contracting optic flow produced more postural sway than expanding optic flow. In addition, the amount of postural sway increased with increasing stimulus speed, but for contracting optic flow only. Taken together, the results of the current study support the view that visual and sensorimotor systems appear to be tailored toward compensating for rigid optic flow stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23660741     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3543-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Exposure-history as a factor in maintaining stability of perception and coordination.

Authors:  R HELD
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.254

2.  Additional oscillation can facilitate visually induced self-motion perception: the effects of its coherence and amplitude gradient.

Authors:  Shinji Nakamura
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Expanding and contracting optic-flow patterns and vection.

Authors:  Andrea Bubka; Frederick Bonato; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  The importance of velocity gradients in the perception of three-dimensional rigidity.

Authors:  B De Bruyn; G A Orban
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Postural responses to simulated moving environments are not invariant for the direction of gaze.

Authors:  C C Gielen; W N van Asten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spatial orientation from optic flow in the central visual field.

Authors:  G J Andersen; B P Dyre
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-05

7.  Asymmetries in the sensitivity to motion in depth: a centripetal bias.

Authors:  M Edwards; D R Badcock
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Asymmetrical cortical processing of radial expansion/contraction in infants and adults.

Authors:  Nobu Shirai; Deirdre Birtles; John Wattam-Bell; Masami K Yamaguchi; So Kanazawa; Janette Atkinson; Oliver Braddick
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-11

9.  Effects of the spatio-temporal structure of optical flow on postural readjustments in man.

Authors:  G Masson; D R Mestre; J Pailhous
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Role of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway.

Authors:  R J Peterka; M S Benolken
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of visual motion consistent or inconsistent with gravity on postural sway.

Authors:  Priscilla Balestrucci; Elena Daprati; Francesco Lacquaniti; Vincenzo Maffei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interaction effects of visual stimulus speed and contrast on postural sway.

Authors:  Vivian Holten; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten; Stella F Donker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Optic flow detection is not influenced by visual-vestibular congruency.

Authors:  Vivian Holten; Paul R MacNeilage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Larger Head Displacement to Optic Flow Presented in the Lower Visual Field.

Authors:  Kanon Fujimoto; Hiroshi Ashida
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-11-22

5.  The Speed of Optic Flow Stimuli Influences Body Sway.

Authors:  Milena Raffi; Aurelio Trofè; Andrea Meoni; Alessandro Piras
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.