Reducing the frequency of episiotomies through a continuous quality improvement program.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) program in reducing episiotomy rates.
DESIGN: Before-and-after study; CQI methods were used to examine the process of care during labour and birth.
INTERVENTIONS: Identification of care factors that would increase the probability of episiotomy. Implementation of initiatives that would change the process of care to minimize the probability of episiotomy. Educational strategies included promotion of better understanding of what constitutes an appropriate episiotomy rate and ways to reduce maternal exhaustion and true fetal distress as well as manoeuvres to protect the perineum during birth.
SETTING: Low-risk family practice obstetrics service in a tertiary care hospital in southwestern Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: All 102 family physicians at the study hospital who provided intrapartum care in the year before and the year during which the CQI program was implemented and the women for whom the care was provided (approximately 1,400 per year). OUTCOME MEASURES: Episiotomy rates (overall, among primiparous and multiparous women, and among individual family physicians) and rates of perineal tear, perineal infection and postpartum readmission.
RESULTS: Although the planned reduction in the episiotomy rate was not achieved during the study period, the overall rate decreased significantly from 44.5% to 33.3% (p < 0.001). Among the primiparous women the rate decreased from 57.6% to 46.2% (p < 0.001) and among the multiparous women from 34.3% to 23.6% (p < 0.001). The reduced episiotomy rate among the primiparous women was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears and a significant increase in the number of women giving birth with an intact perineum or a minor (first-degree) tear. These benefits were not seen among the multiparous women, whose decreased episiotomy rate was associated with a significant increase in the number of women experiencing a second-degree perineal tear. During the intervention period, there was no increase in the rates of vaginal trauma or postpartum bleeding, infection or readmission because of complications related to perineal trauma. The episiotomy rates for most physicians decreased significantly during the intervention period.
CONCLUSIONS: The CQI model may be useful in modifying clinical practices such as episiotomy because it focuses on understanding the process of care and the environment in which care is provided, both of which may have a major impact on physician behaviour. Further study is needed to ascertain the sustainability of the effects of this approach and which components of the model had the greatest effect.