Literature DB >> 6346168

Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980.

S B Thacker, H D Banta.   

Abstract

The benefits and risks of episiotomy in labor and delivery as recorded in the English language literature in over 350 books and articles published since 1860 are reviewed and analyzed. Episiotomy is performed in over 60 per cent of all deliveries in the United States and in a much higher per cent of primigravidas. Yet, there is no clearly defined evidence for its efficacy, particularly for routine use. In addition, although poorly studied, there is evidence that postpartum pain and discomfort are accentuated after episiotomy, and serious complications, including maternal death, can be associated with the procedure. Therefore, carefully designed controlled trials of benefit and risk should be carried out on the use of episiotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6346168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv        ISSN: 0029-7828            Impact factor:   2.347


  50 in total

1.  Midline versus mediolateral episiotomy.

Authors:  S B Thacker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-17

2.  The effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor.

Authors:  A Tsunoda; M Shibusawa; G Kamiyama; M Kusano; Y Shimizu; T Yanaihara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears.

Authors:  Christine Kettle; Therese Dowswell; Khaled Mk Ismail
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-06-16

4.  Testing the Epi-No birth trainer where episiotomy is not practiced.

Authors:  Judy Slome Cohain
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations.

Authors:  Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro; Gláucia M Varella Pereira; Regina Amélia Pessoa Aguiar; Rodrigo Leite Azevedo; Mário Dias Correia-Junior; Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Effect of vaginal delivery on the external anal sphincter muscle innervation pattern evaluated by multichannel surface EMG: results of the multicentre study TASI-2.

Authors:  Corrado Cescon; Diego Riva; Vita Začesta; Kristina Drusany-Starič; Konstantinos Martsidis; Olexander Protsepko; Kaven Baessler; Roberto Merletti
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Who should care for anorectal dysfunction in women?

Authors:  M R Sangalli; A Weil; A Campana
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1996

8.  Episiotomy: Differences in practice between family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  J Ruderman; J C Carroli; A J Reid; M A Murray
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Evaluation of anal incontinence: minimal approach, maximal effectiveness.

Authors:  Harry T Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

10.  West Berkshire perineal management trial.

Authors:  J Sleep; A Grant; J Garcia; D Elbourne; J Spencer; I Chalmers
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.