Literature DB >> 7609953

Spherocylindrical refractive errors and visual acuity.

T W Raasch1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the relation between refractive error and visual acuity is complicated if astigmatic blur is present. No models are in widespread use that allow the combination of spherical and astigmatic errors for the purpose of predicting visual performance.
METHODS: Models for combining spherical and astigmatic errors are discussed, and predictions of these models using data from the literature are presented.
RESULTS: Three models for combining astigmatic with spherical errors are shown to predict visual acuity performance in uncorrected myopic refractive errors. A dioptric vector addition model is shown to have advantages over other candidate models.
CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to combine spherocylindrical refractive errors into a single value when the objective is to correlate these values with visual acuity performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7609953     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199504000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  13 in total

1.  Adaptation to astigmatic blur.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Michael Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Visual impact of Zernike and Seidel forms of monochromatic aberrations.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Six just-noticeable differences in retinal image quality in 1 line of visual acuity: toward quantification of happy versus unhappy patients with 20/20 acuity.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Raymond A Applegate; Yue Shi; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Anisometropia magnitude and visual deficits in previously untreated anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Bin-Bin Chen; Feng-Wei Song; Zhao-Hui Sun; Yi Yang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Visual deficits in anisometropia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Suzanne P McKee; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Effects of optically imposed astigmatism on early eye growth in chicks.

Authors:  Chin Hung Geoffrey Chu; Chea Su Kee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Uncorrected Refractive Error and Distance Visual Acuity in Children Aged 6 to 14 Years.

Authors:  Robert N Kleinstein; Donald O Mutti; Loraine T Sinnott; Lisa A Jones-Jordan; Susan A Cotter; Ruth E Manny; J Daniel Twelker; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.106

9.  Impact of corneal cross-linking combined with photorefractive keratectomy on blurring strength.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Haris Sideroudi; Dimitris Angelonias; Kimonas Georgantzoglou; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-01

10.  Biometry and visual function of a healthy cohort in Leipzig, Germany.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Zocher; Jos J Rozema; Nicole Oertel; Jens Dawczynski; Peter Wiedemann; Franziska G Rauscher
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.