Literature DB >> 20932989

Visual deficits in anisometropia.

Dennis M Levi1, Suzanne P McKee, J Anthony Movshon.   

Abstract

Amblyopia is usually associated with the presence of anisometropia, strabismus or both early in life. We set out to explore quantitative relationships between the degree of anisometropia and the loss of visual function, and to examine how the presence of strabismus affects visual function in observers with anisometropia. We measured optotype acuity, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity in 84 persons with anisometropia and compared their results with those of 27 persons with high bilateral refractive error (isoametropia) and 101 persons with both strabismus and anisometropia. All subjects participated in a large-scale study of amblyopia (McKee et al., 2003). We found no consistent visual abnormalities in the strong eye, and therefore report only on vision in the weaker, defined as the eye with lower acuity. LogMAR acuity falls off markedly with increasing anisometropia in non-strabismic anisometropes, while contrast sensitivity is much less affected. Acuity degrades rapidly with increases in both hyperopic and myopic anisometropia, but the risk of amblyopia is about twice as great in hyperopic than myopic anisometropes of comparable refractive imbalance. For a given degree of refractive imbalance, strabismic anisometropes perform considerably worse than anisometropes without strabismus--visual acuity for strabismics was on average 2.5 times worse than for non-strabismics with similar anisometropia. For observers with equal refractive error in the two eyes there is very little change in acuity or sensitivity with increasing (bilateral) refractive error except for one extreme individual (bilaterally refractive error of -15 D). Most pure anisometropes with interocular differences less than 4D retain some stereopsis, and the degree is correlated with the acuity of the weak eye. We conclude that even modest interocular differences in refractive error can influence visual function.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20932989      PMCID: PMC3010510          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  47 in total

1.  Comparison of letter and Vernier acuities with dioptric and diffusive blur.

Authors:  H E Bedell; S Patel; S T Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  A method of determining the over-all quantum efficiency of visual discriminations.

Authors:  H B BARLOW
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Binocular deficits associated with early alternating monocular defocus. II. Neurophysiological observations.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Kazuki Matsuura; Takafumi Mori; Janice M Wensveen; Ronald S Harwerth; Earl L Smith; Yuzo Chino
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Model of peripheral and amblyopic hyperacuity.

Authors:  H R Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The association between nonstrabismic anisometropia, amblyopia, and subnormal binocularity.

Authors:  D R Weakley
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Selective losses in binocular vision in anisometropic amblyopes.

Authors:  K Holopigian; R Blake; M J Greenwald
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Identifying amblyopia using associated conditions, acuity, and nonacuity features.

Authors:  M C Flom; H E Bedell
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1985-03

9.  Astigmatism and acuity in two primate infants.

Authors:  D Y Teller; J L Allen; D M Regal; D L Mayer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Therapy of anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  J D Kivlin; J T Flynn
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Observations on the relationship between anisometropia, amblyopia and strabismus.

Authors:  Earl L Smith; Li-Fang Hung; Baskar Arumugam; Janice M Wensveen; Yuzo M Chino; Ronald S Harwerth
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Linking assumptions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Comment on anisometropia magnitude and visual deficits in previously untreated anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Sumita Sethi; Keerti Mundey; Mridu Chaudhary
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 4.  Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; David C Knill; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Early monocular defocus disrupts the normal development of receptive-field structure in V2 neurons of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Tao; Bin Zhang; Guofu Shen; Janice Wensveen; Earl L Smith; Shinji Nishimoto; Izumi Ohzawa; Yuzo M Chino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Rethinking amblyopia 2020.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Anisometropia magnitude and visual deficits in previously untreated anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Bin-Bin Chen; Feng-Wei Song; Zhao-Hui Sun; Yi Yang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 9.  Amblyopia and binocular vision.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 10.  The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Arthur Bradley; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 21.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.