Literature DB >> 7604698

Evaluation of Boneloc. Chemical and mechanical properties, and a randomized clinical study of 30 total hip arthroplasties.

J Thanner1, C Freij-Larsson, J Kärrholm, H Malchau, B Wesslén.   

Abstract

We evaluated the mechanical, chemical and clinical properties of Boneloc cement using radiostereometry and a series of laboratory tests. Compared to a standard cement (Palacos) the new cement displayed reduced tensile strength, elastic modulus, curing and glass transition temperatures. The amount of MMA extracted during 3 weeks in methanol was smaller for the Boneloc, but the total amount of released monomers was larger. The adhesion to stainless steel and bone did not differ. Radiostereometric analysis during the first postoperative year in 30 patients randomized to fixation of hip prostheses using either of the 2 cements displayed increased proximal migration of the cup and increased stem subsidence when Boneloc had been used. Part of the stem subsidence occurred inside the cement mantle. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that the inferior fixation in the Boneloc group is mainly caused by its mechanical properties. Other mechanisms, such as increased release of monomers, may also be important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7604698     DOI: 10.3109/17453679508995525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  17 in total

1.  The influence of cement viscosity on the early migration of a tapered polished femoral stem.

Authors:  S Glyn-Jones; J Hicks; J Alfaro-Adrian; H S Gill; P McLardy-Smith; D W Murray
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  No biological advantage with a low temperature curing versus a conventional bone cement: an experimental, mechanical and histomorphometrical study in the rabbit tibia.

Authors:  P Morberg; C B Johansson; H Malchau
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Factors affecting the mechanical and viscoelastic properties of acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  A J C Lee; R S M Ling; Sabina Gheduzzi; Jean-Pierre Simon; R J Renfro
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  The rationale for a spine registry.

Authors:  C Röder; U Müller; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Early Subsidence Predicts Failure of a Cemented Femoral Stem With Minor Design Changes.

Authors:  Per-Erik Johanson; Martin Antonsson; Bita Shareghi; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Reduced femoral component subsidence with improved impaction grafting at revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D W Howie; S A Callary; M A McGee; N C Russell; L B Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A prospective randomised radiostereometric analysis trial of SmartSet HV and Palacos R bone cements in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Otto S Husby; Kristin Haugan; Pål Benum; Olav A Foss
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03-03

8.  New radiopaque acrylic bone cement. II. Acrylic bone cement with bromine-containing monomer.

Authors:  M C Rusu; I C Ichim; M Popa; M Rusu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Creep and fatigue behavior of a novel 2-component paste-like formulation of acrylic bone cements.

Authors:  Ulrike Köster; Raimund Jaeger; Mareike Bardts; Christian Wahnes; Hubert Büchner; Klaus-Dieter Kühn; Sebastian Vogt
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Longitudinal migration and inducible displacement of the Mobility Total Ankle System.

Authors:  Michael J Dunbar; Jason W Fong; David A Wilson; Allan W Hennigar; Patricia A Francis; Mark A Glazebrook
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.