Literature DB >> 7602396

Femoral component migration in total knee arthroplasty: randomized study comparing cemented and uncemented fixation of the Miller-Galante I design.

K G Nilsson1, J Kärrholm, L Linder.   

Abstract

The Miller-Galante I knee replacement was inserted in 25 women and three men (33 knees) with osteoarthrosis. All patients received a TiAlV femoral component with a commercially pure titanium fiber-mesh undersurface. Cemented or cementless fixation was used based on a randomization protocol. Micromotions of the femoral components were recorded with roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis during the first 2 postoperative years. The magnitude of migration did not differ between cemented and uncemented fixation. The number of nonmigrating prostheses decreased from 21 (12 cemented and nine uncemented) at 3 months to six (three cemented and three uncemented) at 24 months. In both groups, the magnitude of prosthetic tilting about the longitudinal axis (internal-external rotation) was as large as that about the transverse axis (flexion-extension). Rotation into extension was as common as rotation into flexion. The largest translations were recorded at either of the posterior condyles. In 10 uncemented components, radiolucent lines were seen at the distal interface postoperatively. Proximal migration of the femoral component was recorded in these knees, and the width of the lines decreased or the lines disappeared totally at 24 months. After 2 years, lines were noted around four cemented and four uncemented replacements, mainly anteriorly or distally. All of these prostheses migrated. One prosthesis, revised because of malalignment, displayed pronounced migration after an initial period of stability. Bone ingrowth was observed anteriorly and anterodistally despite the presence of motions of 1 mm or more.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7602396     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100130308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  6 in total

1.  Cemented versus uncemented femoral components in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Guillaume Demey; Elvire Servien; Sebastien Lustig; Tarik Aït Si Selmi; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Primary stability of tibial components in TKA: in vitro comparison of two cementing techniques.

Authors:  Adrian Skwara; J Figiel; T Knott; J R J Paletta; S Fuchs-Winkelmann; C O Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Uncemented or cemented femoral components work equally well in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anders Henricson; Radek Wojtowicz; Kjell G Nilsson; Sead Crnalic
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Cemented or cementless total knee arthroplasty? - Comparative results of 200 cases at a minimum follow-up of 11 years.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Prudhon; Régis Verdier
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-12-12

5.  Tibial component rotation around the transverse axis measured by radiostereometry predicts aseptic loosening better than maximal total point motion.

Authors:  Asgeir Gudnason; Gunnar Adalberth; Kjell-Gunnar Nilsson; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 6.  Migration of the femoral component and clinical outcomes after total knee replacement: a narrative review.

Authors:  R Zinno; S Di Paolo; G Ambrosino; D Alesi; S Zaffagnini; G Barone; L Bragonzoni
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-12-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.