Mathias Davids1,2, Bastien Guérin2,3, Axel Vom Endt4, Lothar R Schad1, Lawrence L Wald2,3,5. 1. Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, BW, Germany. 2. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts. 3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany. 5. Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Abstract
PURPOSE: As gradient performance increases, peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is becoming a significant constraint for fast MRI. Despite its impact, PNS is not directly included in the coil design process. Instead, the PNS characteristics of a gradient are assessed on healthy subjects after prototype construction. We attempt to develop a tool to inform coil design by predicting the PNS thresholds and activation locations in the human body using electromagnetic field simulations coupled to a neurodynamic model. We validate the approach by comparing simulated and experimentally determined thresholds for 3 gradient coils. METHODS: We first compute the electric field induced by the switching fields within a detailed electromagnetic body model, which includes a detailed atlas of peripheral nerves. We then calculate potential changes along the nerves and evaluate their response using a neurodynamic model. Both a male and female body model are used to study 2 body gradients and 1 head gradient. RESULTS: There was good agreement between the average simulated thresholds of the male and female models with the experimental average (normalized root-mean-square error: <10% and <5% in most cases). The simulation could also interrogate thresholds above those accessible by the experimental setup and allowed identification of the site of stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Our simulation framework allows accurate prediction of gradient coil PNS thresholds and provides detailed information on location and "next nerve" thresholds that are not available experimentally. As such, we hope that PNS simulations can have a potential role in the design phase of high performance MRI gradient coils.
PURPOSE: As gradient performance increases, peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is becoming a significant constraint for fast MRI. Despite its impact, PNS is not directly included in the coil design process. Instead, the PNS characteristics of a gradient are assessed on healthy subjects after prototype construction. We attempt to develop a tool to inform coil design by predicting the PNS thresholds and activation locations in the human body using electromagnetic field simulations coupled to a neurodynamic model. We validate the approach by comparing simulated and experimentally determined thresholds for 3 gradient coils. METHODS: We first compute the electric field induced by the switching fields within a detailed electromagnetic body model, which includes a detailed atlas of peripheral nerves. We then calculate potential changes along the nerves and evaluate their response using a neurodynamic model. Both a male and female body model are used to study 2 body gradients and 1 head gradient. RESULTS: There was good agreement between the average simulated thresholds of the male and female models with the experimental average (normalized root-mean-square error: <10% and <5% in most cases). The simulation could also interrogate thresholds above those accessible by the experimental setup and allowed identification of the site of stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Our simulation framework allows accurate prediction of gradient coil PNS thresholds and provides detailed information on location and "next nerve" thresholds that are not available experimentally. As such, we hope that PNS simulations can have a potential role in the design phase of high performance MRI gradient coils.
Authors: K Setsompop; R Kimmlingen; E Eberlein; T Witzel; J Cohen-Adad; J A McNab; B Keil; M D Tisdall; P Hoecht; P Dietz; S F Cauley; V Tountcheva; V Matschl; V H Lenz; K Heberlein; A Potthast; H Thein; J Van Horn; A Toga; F Schmitt; D Lehne; B R Rosen; V Wedeen; L L Wald Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Anil Kumar RamRakhyani; Zachary B Kagan; David J Warren; Richard A Normann; Gianluca Lazzi Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Seung-Kyun Lee; Jean-Baptiste Mathieu; Dominic Graziani; Joseph Piel; Eric Budesheim; Eric Fiveland; Christopher J Hardy; Ek Tsoon Tan; Bruce Amm; Thomas K-F Foo; Matt A Bernstein; John Huston; Yunhong Shu; John F Schenck Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ek T Tan; Robert Y Shih; Jhimli Mitra; Tim Sprenger; Yihe Hua; Chitresh Bhushan; Matt A Bernstein; Jennifer A McNab; J Kevin DeMarco; Vincent B Ho; Thomas K F Foo Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Valerie Klein; Jaume Coll-Font; Livia Vendramini; Donald Straney; Mathias Davids; Natalie G Ferris; Lothar R Schad; David E Sosnovik; Christopher T Nguyen; Lawrence L Wald; Bastien Guérin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-07-30 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Susie Y Huang; Thomas Witzel; Boris Keil; Alina Scholz; Mathias Davids; Peter Dietz; Elmar Rummert; Rebecca Ramb; John E Kirsch; Anastasia Yendiki; Qiuyun Fan; Qiyuan Tian; Gabriel Ramos-Llordén; Hong-Hsi Lee; Aapo Nummenmaa; Berkin Bilgic; Kawin Setsompop; Fuyixue Wang; Alexandru V Avram; Michal Komlosh; Dan Benjamini; Kulam Najmudeen Magdoom; Sudhir Pathak; Walter Schneider; Dmitry S Novikov; Els Fieremans; Slimane Tounekti; Choukri Mekkaoui; Jean Augustinack; Daniel Berger; Alexander Shapson-Coe; Jeff Lichtman; Peter J Basser; Lawrence L Wald; Bruce R Rosen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-08-28 Impact factor: 7.400
Authors: Ek T Tan; Yihe Hua; Eric W Fiveland; Mark E Vermilyea; Joseph E Piel; Keith J Park; Vincent B Ho; Thomas K F Foo Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mathias Davids; Bastien Guérin; Valerie Klein; Martin Schmelz; Lothar R Schad; Lawrence L Wald Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Valentina Hartwig; Giorgio Virgili; F Ederica Mattei; Cristiano Biagini; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Francesco Campanella; Luigi Landini; Fabriziomaria Gobba; Alberto Modenese; Giulio Giovannetti Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2021-09-29 Impact factor: 2.602