Literature DB >> 7595247

Lexical effects on phonetic categorization: the role of stimulus naturalness and stimulus quality.

M W Burton1, S E Blumstein.   

Abstract

A series of experiments was conducted to determine whether the effects of lexical status on phonetic categorization were influenced by stimulus naturalness (replicating M. W. Burton, S. R. Baum, & S. E. Blumstein, 1989, who manipulated the intrinsic properties of the stimuli) and by stimulus quality (presenting the stimuli in white noise). The experiments compared continua varying in voice onset time (VOT) only to continua covarying VOT and amplitude of the burst and aspiration noise in no-noise and noise conditions. Results overall showed that the emergence of a lexical effect was influenced by stimulus quality but not by stimulus naturalness. Contrary to previous findings, significant lexical effects failed to emerge in the slower reaction time ranges. These results suggest that stimulus quality contributes to lexical effects on phonetic categorization, whereas stimulus naturalness does not.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7595247     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.5.1230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  5 in total

1.  Finding the signal by adding noise: The role of noncontrastive phonetic variability in early word learning.

Authors:  Gwyneth C Rost; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2010-11-01

2.  Lexical bias in word recognition by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Steven P Gianakas; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference.

Authors:  Naomi H Feldman; Thomas L Griffiths; James L Morgan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus; Michael J Spivey; Dana Subik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Temporal cortex reflects effects of sentence context on phonetic processing.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Caden Salvata; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.