Literature DB >> 7589312

Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements.

C J Winstein1, P S Pohl.   

Abstract

Insight into the functional neural substrates associated with the control of goal-directed purposive movements can be obtained through the study of the performance of individuals with brain damage. The control of rapid reciprocal aiming was investigated by comparing ipsilateral limb performance of subjects with unilateral brain damage to that of controls performing with the same limb. Thirty right-hand-dominant individuals, ten with right hemisphere stroke, ten with left hemisphere stroke, and ten age-matched controls performed unconstrained alternating tapping movements under three conditions of task complexity. The path of the stylus was recorded by video using two-dimensional kinematic techniques. Key kinematic features of the vertical and horizontal components of the trajectories were analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative methods. All subjects with brain damage showed prolonged movement times; however, the locus of the slowing depended on lesion side. Specifically, subjects with left stroke showed deficits in the open-loop component of the movement across all three conditions of task complexity, and a prolonged reversal phase surrounding target impact, particularly in the most complex condition. In contrast, subjects with right stroke showed deficits in the closed-loop phase of the movement prior to target impact, particularly in the most complex condition when visual information was necessary for accuracy. Together, these results suggest that for the control of rapid goal-directed aiming movements, the left hemisphere is dominant for task-relevant aspects of processing associated with the ballistic component and the timing or triggering of sequential movements. In contrast, the right hemisphere is dominant for processing associated with rapid, on-line visual information even when target location is known and direction is certain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7589312     DOI: 10.1007/BF00242191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Feedback versus motor programming in the control of aimed movements.

Authors:  S T Klapp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The effect of accuracy constraints on three-dimensional movement kinematics.

Authors:  T E Milner; M M Ijaz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 3.  Hemispheric differences in motor control.

Authors:  M A Goodale
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The role of the hemispheres in closed loop movements.

Authors:  K Y Haaland; D Harrington
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Search for a common neurocognitive mechanism for language and movements.

Authors:  O J Tzeng; W S Wang
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1984-06

6.  Models for the speed and accuracy of aimed movements.

Authors:  D E Meyer; J E Smith; C E Wright
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Visual control of discrete aiming movements.

Authors:  S A Wallace; K M Newell
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1983-05

8.  The role of premotor cortex and the supplementary motor area in the temporal control of movement in man.

Authors:  U Halsband; N Ito; J Tanji; H J Freund
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  Hemispheric differences in temporal resolution.

Authors:  G R Hammond
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  The effects of task complexity on motor performance in left and right CVA patients.

Authors:  K Y Haaland; D L Harrington; R Yeo
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  66 in total

1.  Hemispheric specialization in the co-ordination of arm and trunk movements during pointing in patients with unilateral brain damage.

Authors:  Danilo Y Esparza; Philippe S Archambault; Carolee J Winstein; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Motor enrichment and the induction of plasticity before or after brain injury.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kleim; Theresa A Jones; Timothy Schallert
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Impaired interlimb coordination of voluntary leg movements in poststroke hemiparesis.

Authors:  Shih-Chiao Tseng; Susanne M Morton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Relationship of diminished interjoint coordination after stroke to hand path consistency.

Authors:  Geetanjali Gera; Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Colleen A Lewis; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations depends on handedness.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Does hand dominance affect the use of motor abundance when reaching to uncertain targets?

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Effect of auditory feedback differs according to side of hemiparesis: a comparative pilot study.

Authors:  Johanna V G Robertson; Thomas Hoellinger; Påvel Lindberg; Djamel Bensmail; Sylvain Hanneton; Agnès Roby-Brami
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Bilateral impairments in task-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch reflex following stroke.

Authors:  Randy D Trumbower; James M Finley; Jonathan B Shemmell; Claire F Honeycutt; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.