Literature DB >> 7578209

Landmark positioning on maxilla of cleft lip and palate infant--a reality?

N G Seckel1, I van der Tweel, G A Elema, T F Specken.   

Abstract

In this study, we tested the precision of landmark positioning for a set of landmarks that can be used for the edentulous cleft lip and palate maxilla of the infant, by analyzing intraobserver and interobserver repositioning and measuring on a series of 121 (unilateral and bilateral) study casts. To date, no data on interobserver and only minimal data on intraobserver reproducibility are available. We found intraobserver reproducibility acceptable with total measurement errors ranging from 0.51 to 1.54 mm. Interobserver reproducibility was only slightly less with total measurement errors ranging from 0.63 to 1.57 mm. Total measurement errors were found to be relatively high for some variables. Both the intra- and interobserver analyses show insight into expected precision of landmark positioning during placement of these points on casts. A learning effect for precise positioning has been demonstrated in both analyses. The points with the highest precision overall are Q and Q', followed by the linear measurements PL and P'L'. Quality of regular study casts (impressions) is an important factor, with room for improvement. Reproducible landmark positioning on the cleft lip and palate infant's maxilla, can only be a reality if the quality of the cast is optimal and the investigator is experienced. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility are in the same range, which justifies the comparison of results from different studies and relieves future investigators of the need to have all measurements within a study conducted by the same investigator. Aspects of the biologic meaning of landmarks are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7578209     DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1995_032_0434_lpomoc_2.3.co_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  10 in total

1.  Sensitivity analysis for plane orientation in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis based on superimposition of serial cone beam computed tomography images.

Authors:  M O Lagravère; P W Major; J Carey
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Maxillary reaction patterns identified by three-dimensional analysis of casts from infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  J Neuschulz; I Schaefer; M Scheer; H Christ; B Braumann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Three dimensional maxillary growth modeling in newborns.

Authors:  R Bruggink; F Baan; G J C Kramer; T J J Maal; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman; S J Bergé; E M Bronkhorst; E M Ongkosuwito
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Evaluation of the intercanine distance in newborns with cleft lip and palate using 3D digital casts.

Authors:  Bianca Zeponi Fernandes Mello; Viviane Mendes Fernandes; Cleide Felício Carvalho Carrara; Maria Aparecida Andrade Moreira Machado; Daniela Gamba Garib; Thais Marchini Oliveira
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Supporting the drive to thrive in cleft lip and palate infant- a case report.

Authors:  Thabitha Rani S; Manjula M; Sreelakshmi N; Rajendra Reddy E; Rajesh A
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of the deciduous dentition of patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate and delayed cleft closure.

Authors:  Karl-Friedrich Krey; Joachim Börngen; Karl-Heinz Dannhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Multiobjective optimization framework for landmark measurement error correction in three-dimensional cephalometric tomography.

Authors:  A DeCesare; M Secanell; M O Lagravère; J Carey
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Reliability of Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models of Patients with a Cleft Lip and Palate.

Authors:  R Burcu Nur Yılmaz; Derya Germeç Çakan; Merve Altay; Halil Ibrahim Canter
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-06-01

9.  Factors influencing superimposition error of 3D cephalometric landmarks by plane orientation method using 4 reference points: 4 point superimposition error regression model.

Authors:  Jae Joon Hwang; Kee-Deog Kim; Hyok Park; Chang Seo Park; Ho-Gul Jeong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Three-Dimensional Morphological Changes of the True Cleft under Passive Presurgical Orthopaedics in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Prasad Nalabothu; Benito K Benitez; Michel Dalstra; Carlalberta Verna; Andreas A Mueller
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.