Literature DB >> 20841457

Sensitivity analysis for plane orientation in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis based on superimposition of serial cone beam computed tomography images.

M O Lagravère1, P W Major, J Carey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential errors associated with superimposition of serial cone beam CT (CBCT) images utilizing reference planes based on cranial base landmarks using a sensitivity analysis.
METHODS: CBCT images from 62 patients participating in a maxillary expansion clinical trial were analysed. The left and right auditory external meatus (AEM), dorsum foramen magnum (DFM) and the midpoint between the left and right foramen spinosum (ELSA) were used to define a three-dimensional (3D) anatomical reference co-ordinate system. Intraclass correlation coefficients for all four landmarks were obtained. Transformation of the reference system was carried out using the four landmarks and mathematical comparison of values.
RESULTS: Excellent intrareliability values for each dimension were obtained for each landmark. Evaluation of the method to transform the co-ordinate system was first done by comparing interlandmark distances before and after transformations, giving errors in lengths in the order of 10-14% (software rounding error). A sensitivity evaluation was performed by adding 0.25 mm, 0.5 mm and 1 mm error in one axis of the ELSA. A positioning error of 0.25 mm in the ELSA can produce up to 1.0 mm error in other cranial base landmark co-ordinates. These errors could be magnified to distant landmarks where in some cases menton and infraorbital landmarks were displaced 4-6 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Minor variations in location of the ELSA, both the AEM and the DFM landmarks produce large and potentially clinically significant uncertainty in co-ordinate system alignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20841457      PMCID: PMC3520184          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/17319459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  20 in total

1.  Skull base growth in childhood.

Authors:  S Sgouros; K Natarajan; A D Hockley; J H Goldin; M Wake
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.162

2.  A 3-dimensional analysis of molar movement during headgear treatment.

Authors:  Jennifer L Ashmore; Brenda F Kurland; Gregory J King; Timothy T Wheeler; Joseph Ghafari; Douglas S Ramsay
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  3-D volume imaging for dentistry: a new dimension.

Authors:  Robert A Danforth; Ivan Dus; James Mah
Journal:  J Calif Dent Assoc       Date:  2003-11

4.  Cone beam volume tomography: an imaging option for diagnosis of complex mandibular third molar anatomical relationships.

Authors:  Robert A Danforth; Jerry Peck; Paul Hall
Journal:  J Calif Dent Assoc       Date:  2003-11

5.  Three-dimensional assessment of morphologic changes of the maxilla: a comparison of 2 kinds of palatal expanders.

Authors:  Nanci L Oliveira; Adriana C Da Silveira; Budi Kusnoto; Grace Viana
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.

Authors:  Manuel O Lagravère; Corey Low; Carlos Flores-Mir; Raymund Chung; Jason P Carey; Giseon Heo; Paul W Major
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  The reliability of head film measurements. 3. Tracing superimposition.

Authors:  S Baumrind; D Miller; R Molthen
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1976-12

8.  The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.

Authors:  Z Mirzen Arat; Meliha Rübendüz; Ayça Arman Akgül
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: Part II. Normal values and growth trends.

Authors:  A A Waitzman; J C Posnick; D C Armstrong; G E Pron
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1992-03

Review 10.  Normal development and growth of the human neurocranium and cranial base.

Authors:  H Friede
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1981
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Exploring CBCT-based DICOM files. A systematic review on the properties of images used to evaluate maxillofacial bone grafts.

Authors:  Rubens Spin-Neto; Elcio Marcantonio; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Evaluation of a novel palatal suture maturation classification as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography imaging of a pre- and postexpansion treatment cohort.

Authors:  Darren Isfeld; Carlos Flores-Mir; Vladimir Leon-Salazar; Manuel Lagravère
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Reliability of three-dimensional anterior cranial base superimposition methods for assessment of overall hard tissue changes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Cecilia Ponce-Garcia; Manuel Lagravere-Vich; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Antonio Carlos de Olivera Ruellas; Jason Carey; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Multiobjective optimization framework for landmark measurement error correction in three-dimensional cephalometric tomography.

Authors:  A DeCesare; M Secanell; M O Lagravère; J Carey
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Reproducibility of three-dimensional coordinate systems based on craniofacial landmarks: a tentative evaluation of four systems created on images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography with a large field of view.

Authors:  Momoko Shibata; Hiroyuki Nawa; Yoshitaka Kise; Mariko Fuyamada; Kazuhito Yoshida; Akitoshi Katsumata; Eiichiro Ariji; Shigemi Goto
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 6.  3D superimposition of craniofacial imaging-The utility of multicentre collaborations.

Authors:  Marilia Yatabe; Juan Carlos Prieto; Martin Styner; Hongtu Zhu; Antonio Carlos Ruellas; Beatriz Paniagua; Francois Budin; Erika Benavides; Brandon Shoukri; Loic Michoud; Nina Ribera; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Factors influencing superimposition error of 3D cephalometric landmarks by plane orientation method using 4 reference points: 4 point superimposition error regression model.

Authors:  Jae Joon Hwang; Kee-Deog Kim; Hyok Park; Chang Seo Park; Ho-Gul Jeong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on various skeletal structures of the head using surface models.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gkantidis; Michael Schauseil; Pawel Pazera; Berna Zorkun; Christos Katsaros; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The impact of reorienting cone-beam computed tomographic images in varied head positions on the coordinates of anatomical landmarks.

Authors:  Jae Hun Kim; Ho-Gul Jeong; Jae Joon Hwang; Jung-Hee Lee; Sang-Sun Han
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2016-06-23

10.  United Reference Method for three-dimensional treatment evaluation.

Authors:  Shereef Shahen; Manuel O Lagravère; Gennaro Carrino; Fady Fahim; Reham Abdelsalam; Carlos Flores-Mir; Letizia Perillo
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.