Literature DB >> 23807257

Maxillary reaction patterns identified by three-dimensional analysis of casts from infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

J Neuschulz1, I Schaefer, M Scheer, H Christ, B Braumann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In order to visualize and quantify the direction and extent of morphological upper-jaw changes in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) during early orthodontic treatment, a three-dimensional method of cast analysis for routine application was developed. In the present investigation, this method was used to identify reaction patterns associated with specific cleft forms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included a cast series reflecting the upper-jaw situations of 46 infants with complete (n=27) or incomplete (n=19) UCLP during week 1 and months 3, 6, and 12 of life. Three-dimensional datasets were acquired and visualized with scanning software (DigiModel®; OrthoProof, The Netherlands). Following interactive identification of landmarks on the digitized surface relief, a defined set of representative linear parameters were three-dimensionally measured. At the same time, the three-dimensional surfaces of one patient series were superimposed based on a defined reference plane. Morphometric differences were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Thanks to the user-friendly software, all landmarks could be identified quickly and reproducibly, thus, allowing for simultaneous three-dimensional measurement of all defined parameters. The measured values revealed that significant morphometric differences were present in all three planes of space between the two patient groups. Patients with complete UCLP underwent significantly larger reductions in cleft width (p<0.001), and sagittal growth in the complete UCLP group exceeded sagittal growth in the incomplete UCLP group by almost 50% within the first year of life.
CONCLUSION: Based on patients with incomplete versus complete UCLP, different reaction patterns were identified that depended not on apparent severities of malformation but on cleft forms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23807257     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-013-0153-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  43 in total

1.  Comparison of the spatial landmark scatter of various 3D digitalization methods.

Authors:  Florian Boldt; Christian Weinzierl; Klaus Hertrich; Ursula Hirschfelder
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  The repair of the unilateral cleft lip by the stencil method.

Authors:  C W TENNISON
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg (1946)       Date:  1952-02

3.  Results of randomized controlled trial of soft palate first versus hard palate first repair in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Bruce Richard; Joyce Russell; Siobhan McMahon; Ron Pigott
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2006-05

4.  Quantitative 3D maxillary arch evaluation of two different infant managements for unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  C N Prasad; J L Marsh; R E Long; M Galic; D V Huebener; S J Bresina; M W Vannier; T K Pilgram; M Mazaheri; S Robison; T Bartell
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2000-11

5.  Landmark positioning on maxilla of cleft lip and palate infant--a reality?

Authors:  N G Seckel; I van der Tweel; G A Elema; T F Specken
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1995-09

6.  Long-term evidence for favorable midfacial growth after delayed hard palate repair in UCLP patients.

Authors:  H Friede; H Enemark
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2001-07

7.  Two- or three-dimensional cast analysis in patients with cleft lip and palate?

Authors:  B Braumann; S E Rosenhayn; C Bourauel; A Jäger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 3: dental arch relationships.

Authors:  Kirsten Mølsted; Viveca Brattström; Birte Prahl-Andersen; William C Shaw; Gunvor Semb
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2005-01

9.  Patterns of maxillary alveolar arch growth changes of infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Bert Braumann; Ludger Keilig; Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer; Christoph Bourauel; Stefaan Bergé; Andreas Jäger
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2003-07

10.  Vertical and sagittal growth in patients with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate-a retrospective cephalometric evaluation.

Authors:  Alexandra I Holst; Stefan Holst; Emeka Nkenke; Matthias Fenner; Ursula Hirschfelder
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2009-02-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary development in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate during the first six years of life.

Authors:  Nadezhda Stancheva; Karl-Heinz Dannhauer; Alexander Hemprich; Karl-Friedrich Krey
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Histologic Aspect of the Curved Vomerine Mucosa in Cleft Lip and Palate.

Authors:  Benito K Benitez; Andrzej Brudnicki; Prasad Nalabothu; Jeannette A von Jackowski; Elisabeth Bruder; Andreas Albert Mueller
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2021-07-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.