Literature DB >> 31294408

Reliability of Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models of Patients with a Cleft Lip and Palate.

R Burcu Nur Yılmaz1, Derya Germeç Çakan1, Merve Altay1, Halil Ibrahim Canter2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the more and less reliable measurements/methods and (2) the influence of knowledge and skill on the inter-examiner, intra-examiner, and inter-method reliability of nasolabial measurements on plaster casts and three dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetric images of casts in infants with an unrepaired unilateral cleft lip and palate (UUCLP).
METHODS: Preoperative extraoral plaster casts from 42 patients with UUCLP were measured with a digital caliper, and the image acquisition of casts was performed with the 3dMDface stereophotogrammetry system (3dMD, Atlanta, GA). Two examiners (one postgraduate student, one lecturer) evaluated 19 nasolabial measurements in two separate sessions.
RESULTS: Intra-rater, inter-rater, and inter-method reliability was lower in measurements of nasal, philtral, and nasal floor width. Almost all of the interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for measurements performed by the lecturer were above 0.75, whereas the intra-examiner reliability of some measurements performed by the postgraduate student showed low ICC (<0.75).
CONCLUSION: Measurements of curving slopes, such as nasal width, of small dimensions, such as nostril floor width, and deformity-affected anatomic parts, such as philtrum width, presented a low reliability. Measurements on 3D images showed a higher reliability compared to plaster model measurements performed by the postgraduate student. Therefore, it may be recommended to use 3D digital images of infants with CLP for nasolabial measurements especially if performed in postgraduate settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cleft lip and palate; plaster model; reliability; stereophotogrammetry

Year:  2019        PMID: 31294408      PMCID: PMC6605881          DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Orthod        ISSN: 2148-9505


  30 in total

1.  Three-dimensional acquisition and visualization of dental arch features from optically digitized models.

Authors:  D Dirksen; S Diederichs; C Runte; G von Bally; F Bollmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models.

Authors:  A Bell; A F Ayoub; P Siebert
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2003-09

3.  Facial planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons.

Authors:  G William Arnett; Michael J Gunson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.

Authors:  Seth M Weinberg; Nicole M Scott; Katherine Neiswanger; Carla A Brandon; Mary L Marazita
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2004-09

5.  A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 5. General discussion and conclusions.

Authors:  W C Shaw; E Dahl; C Asher-McDade; V Brattström; M Mars; J McWilliam; K Mølsted; D A Plint; B Prahl-Andersen; C Roberts
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1992-09

6.  Accuracy of facial plaster casts.

Authors:  Christof Holberg; Katja Schwenzer; Luai Mahaini; Ingrid Rudzki-Janson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Three-dimensional analysis of the child cleft face.

Authors:  S Duffy; J H Noar; R D Evans; R Sanders
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2000-03

8.  Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.

Authors:  Peter A Costalos; Keivan Sarraf; Thomas J Cangialosi; Stella Efstratiadis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 9.  Standardized facial photography of cleft patients: just fit the grid?

Authors:  F Vegter; J J Hage
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2000-09

10.  Comparison of plaster casting with three-dimensional cranial imaging.

Authors:  Timothy R Littlefield; Jennifer C Cherney; Jerry N Luisi; Stephen P Beals; Kevin M Kelly; Jeanne K Pomatto
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2005-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.