Literature DB >> 7565393

How water equivalent are water-equivalent solid materials for output calibration of photon and electron beams?

V M Tello1, R C Tailor, W F Hanson.   

Abstract

The water equivalency of five "water-equivalent" solid phantom materials was evaluated in terms of output calibration and energy characterization over a range of energies for both photon (Co-60 to 24 MV) and electron (6-20 MeV) beams. Evaluations compared absorbed doses calculated from ionization measurements using the same dosimeter in the solid phantom materials and in natural water (H2O). Ionization measurements were taken at various calibration depths. The Radiological Physics Center's standard dosimetry system, a Farmer-type ion chamber in a water phantom, was used. Complying with the TG-21 calibration protocol, absorbed doses were calculated using eight measurement and calculational techniques for photons and five for electrons. Results of repeat measurements taken over a period of 2 1/2 years were reproducible to within a +/- 0.3% spread. Results showed that various combinations of measurement techniques and solid phantom materials caused a spread of 3%-4% in the calculation of dose relative to the dose determined from measurements in water for all beam energies on both modalities. An energy dependence of the dose ratios was observed for both photons and electrons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7565393     DOI: 10.1118/1.597613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

1.  Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams.

Authors:  Malcolm McEwen; Larry DeWerd; Geoffrey Ibbott; David Followill; David W O Rogers; Stephen Seltzer; Jan Seuntjens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Toward acquiring comprehensive radiosurgery field commissioning data using the PRESAGE/optical-CT 3D dosimetry system.

Authors:  Corey Clift; Andrew Thomas; John Adamovics; Zheng Chang; Indra Das; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Study of a spherical phantom for Gamma knife dosimetry.

Authors:  Dengsong Zhu; Carlos Austerlitz; Sidi Benhabib; Helvecio Mota; Ron R Allison; Diana Campos
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Real-time dose reconstruction for wedged photon beams: a generalized procedure.

Authors:  A Piermattei; F Greco; A Fidanzio; L Azario; A Porcelli; S Cilla; D Sabatino; A Russo; G D'Onofrio; M Russo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Dosimetric impact of density variations in Solid Water 457 water-equivalent slabs.

Authors:  Dale W Litzenberg; Hanan Amro; Joann I Prisciandaro; Eduardo Acosta; Ian Gallagher; Don A Roberts
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Water equivalence of a solid phantom material for radiation dosimetry applications.

Authors:  Maegan A Gargett; Adam R Briggs; Jeremy T Booth
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-28

7.  Solid water phantom heat conduction: Heating and cooling rates.

Authors:  Martin J Butson; Tsang Cheung; Peter K N Yu
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2008-01

8.  TG-51: experience from 150 institutions, common errors, and helpful hints.

Authors:  R C Tailor; W F Hanson; G S Ibbott
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Dosimetric evaluation of Plastic Water Diagnostic-Therapy.

Authors:  Ramani Ramaseshan; Kirpal Kohli; Fred Cao; Robert K Heaton
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Use of a commercial ion chamber detector array for the measurement of high spatial-resolution photon beam profiles.

Authors:  Vida Karimnia; Matthew D Belley; Robert Rodgers; Michael Price
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.