Literature DB >> 7561983

Measuring patient and relative satisfaction with level or aggressiveness of care and involvement in care decisions in the context of life threatening illness.

G H Guyatt1, A Mitchell, D W Molloy, R Capretta, J Horsman, L Griffith.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to develop valid and reliable discriminative indices which measure patient and relative satisfaction with two closely related aspects of medical care: the level of care received and their involvement in decisions regarding care. We generated items by literature review and interviews with patients, relatives, and health care providers. In the final questionnaires, we included the items identified most frequently as sources of dissatisfaction and rated most important by 102 patients and 153 relatives. To measure reliability and validity we administered the instruments to 105 patients and 75 relatives of competent patients and 89 relatives of incompetent patients. We constructed three questionnaires: the Patient Satisfaction Index with 23 items, the Relative of Competent Patient Satisfaction Index with 34 items, and the Relative of Incompetent Patient Satisfaction Index with 29 items. We found mean scores of 75-80% of the maximum possible score, with a wide range of scores. The intraclass correlation for the instruments varied from 0.86 to 0.94. Correlations with global ratings were high (0.59-0.75) and similar to predictions. Correlations with caregiver ratings were lower than predicted (0.18-0.22). For both patients and relatives, our instruments discriminate between those with higher and lower satisfaction with the level of medical care and with their involvement with decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7561983     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00024-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  10 in total

1.  Evaluations of psychosocial cancer support services: A scoping review.

Authors:  Solveigh P Lingens; Holger Schulz; Christiane Bleich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Doctors' authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany.

Authors:  J Richter; M Eisemann; E Zgonnikova
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Patient participation in clinical encounters: a systematic review to identify self-report measures.

Authors:  Brian Mavis; Margaret Holmes Rovner; Sarah Jorgenson; John Coffey; Nandita Anand; Emi Bulica; Carolyn Marie Gaulden; Jacob Peacock; Alycia Ernst
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Relationships between various attitudes towards self-determination in health care with special reference to an advance directive.

Authors:  M Eisemann; J Richter
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Justice in health care decision-making: patients' appraisals of health care providers and health plan representatives.

Authors:  Mark Fondacaro; Bianca Frogner; Rudolf Moos
Journal:  Soc Justice Res       Date:  2005-03

6.  Family perceptions of prognosis, silence, and the "suddenness" of death.

Authors:  Ann J Russ; Sharon R Kaufman
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03

7.  Patient dissatisfaction: insights into the rehabilitation process.

Authors:  Clarence Liu; Alan J Thompson; E Diane Playford
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  End-of-life care in Germany: Study design, methods and first results of the EPACS study (Establishment of Hospice and Palliative Care Services in Germany).

Authors:  Luis Carlos Escobar Pinzón; Eva Münster; Sabine Fischbeck; Michael Unrath; Matthias Claus; Tanja Martini; Martin Weber
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  Validity of a New Patient Engagement Measure: The Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure.

Authors:  Christopher C Duke; Wendy D Lynch; Brad Smith; Julie Winstanley
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  Advance care planning uptake among patients with severe lung disease: a randomised patient preference trial of a nurse-led, facilitated advance care planning intervention.

Authors:  Craig Sinclair; Kirsten Anne Auret; Sharon Frances Evans; Fiona Williamson; Siobhan Dormer; Anne Wilkinson; Kim Greeve; Audrey Koay; Dot Price; Fraser Brims
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.