Literature DB >> 16108205

Family perceptions of prognosis, silence, and the "suddenness" of death.

Ann J Russ1, Sharon R Kaufman.   

Abstract

Studies of end-of-life communication and care have emphasized physician-patient conversations, often to the exclusion of family members' discussions and interactions with providers, or with patients themselves. Relatively little is known therefore about families' experiences of end-of-life care in the hospital, or the concrete meanings and practices through which families conceive and define communication. Yet increasingly, family members are asked to serve as surrogates and thereby to participate in the facilitation of decisions for medical procedures and the withdrawal of treatments. It is thus worthwhile to consider their perceptions and involvement in hospitalization at the end of life. This paper offers a descriptive account of families' assessments of communication at life's end in the hospital--focusing in particular on their understandings of and conversations about prognosis and its implications. It reflects on the burdens of responsibility and regret posed to families by the ways communication is both conceived and evaded by different players in the hospital setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16108205     DOI: 10.1007/s11013-005-4625-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry        ISSN: 0165-005X


  21 in total

1.  Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study.

Authors:  A M The; T Hak; G Koëter; G van Der Wal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-02

2.  Intensive care, old age, and the problem of death in America.

Authors:  S R Kaufman
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1998-12

3.  The care of dying patients.

Authors:  A W Feinberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  "Choice" in end-of-life decision making: researching fact or fiction?

Authors:  Theresa S Drought; Barbara A Koenig
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2002-10

5.  Prognostic disclosure to patients with cancer near the end of life.

Authors:  E B Lamont; N A Christakis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The SUPPORT project and improving care for seriously ill patients.

Authors:  W J Donnelly
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Disclosure practices and cultural narratives: understanding concealment and silence around cancer in Tuscany, Italy.

Authors:  D R Gordon; E Paci
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Perceptions by family members of the dying experience of older and seriously ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.

Authors:  J Lynn; J M Teno; R S Phillips; A W Wu; N Desbiens; J Harrold; M T Claessens; N Wenger; B Kreling; A F Connors
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  The ellipsis of prognosis in modern medical thought.

Authors:  N A Christakis
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Nov 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  22 in total

1.  End-of-Life Decision Making and Communication of Bereaved Family Members of African Americans with Serious Illness.

Authors:  Esther R Smith-Howell; Susan E Hickman; Salimah H Meghani; Susan M Perkins; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Third-Year Medical Students' Reactions to Surgical Patients in Pain: Doubt, Distress, and Depersonalization.

Authors:  Kimberly E Kopecky; Tiffany J Zens; Pasithorn A Suwanabol; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Constructing High-stakes Surgical Decisions: It's Better to Die Trying.

Authors:  Michael J Nabozny; Jacqueline M Kruser; Nicole M Steffens; Karen J Brasel; Toby C Campbell; Martha E Gaines; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Making the case for talking to patients about the costs of end-of-life care.

Authors:  Greer Donley; Marion Danis
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  "If You Don't Know, All of a Sudden, They're Gone": Caregiver Perspectives About Prognostic Communication for Disabled Elderly Adults.

Authors:  John G Cagle; Keelan M McClymont; Julie N Thai; Alexander K Smith
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  How people die in 2014.

Authors:  Margaret L Schwarze; Michael J Nabozny
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  "Best Case/Worst Case": Qualitative Evaluation of a Novel Communication Tool for Difficult in-the-Moment Surgical Decisions.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Kruser; Michael J Nabozny; Nicole M Steffens; Karen J Brasel; Toby C Campbell; Martha E Gaines; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Association between physicians' beliefs and the option of comfort care for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Yael Schenker; Greer A Tiver; Seo Yeon Hong; Douglas B White
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Engaging Patients, Health Care Professionals, and Community Members to Improve Preoperative Decision Making for Older Adults Facing High-Risk Surgery.

Authors:  Nicole M Steffens; Jennifer L Tucholka; Michael J Nabozny; Andrea E Schmick; Karen J Brasel; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Doubt and belief in physicians' ability to prognosticate during critical illness: the perspective of surrogate decision makers.

Authors:  Lucas S Zier; Jeffrey H Burack; Guy Micco; Anne K Chipman; James A Frank; John M Luce; Douglas B White
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.