Literature DB >> 15372252

Patient dissatisfaction: insights into the rehabilitation process.

Clarence Liu1, Alan J Thompson, E Diane Playford.   

Abstract

Most patients admitted for inpatient rehabilitation find it beneficial even when there is little change in physical disability. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics of patients who felt that they had not benefited from inpatient rehabilitation and to delineate the underlying reasons for this perception. From a database of 331 patients admitted to a neurological rehabilitation unit over a three-year period, we ascertained those with a low score (< 5) on a self-rated visual analogue scale (VAS) regarding their perception of the benefit of rehabilitation. We investigated their disability outcomes, aspects of the rehabilitation process through analysis of integrated care pathways, and from inspection of the multidisciplinary record identified specific adverse factors which might contribute to dissatisfaction. Low VAS scores were detected in 6% of patients (n = 19). These did not correlate with baseline demographic factors or disability levels, but were associated with unresolved external problems regarding community care and accommodation, and conflicts between patients and therapists. We conclude that from the patients' perspective, successful inpatient rehabilitation depends on adequate attention given to community-based issues and health care professionals recognising patients' needs. When these two conditions are not fulfilled, patients are more likely to express a lack of satisfaction with their rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15372252     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-004-0488-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  19 in total

1.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.

Authors:  F I MAHONEY; D W BARTHEL
Journal:  Md State Med J       Date:  1965-02

2.  Clients' perceptions of discharge housing decisions after stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  C Unsworth
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  1996-03

Review 3.  Physician and patient-oriented outcomes in progressive neurological disease: which to measure?

Authors:  J C Hobart; J A Freeman; D L Lamping
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 4.  Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care.

Authors:  P D Cleary; B J McNeil
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  Patient satisfaction: an indicator of quality in disablement services centres.

Authors:  C Smith; M McCreadie; J Unsworth; H I Wickings; A Harrison
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

6.  Development and results of a questionnaire to measure carer satisfaction after stroke.

Authors:  P Pound; P Gompertz; S Ebrahim
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Factors contributing to patient satisfaction with rehabilitation following stroke.

Authors:  M S Clark; D S Smith
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  Scale to measure patient satisfaction with physical therapy.

Authors:  Dominique Monnin; Thomas V Perneger
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-07

9.  Long-term outcome after discharge from a stroke rehabilitation unit.

Authors:  H C Dijkerman; V A Wood; R L Hewer
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec

10.  A neurological rehabilitation unit: audit of activity and outcome.

Authors:  J A Freeman; E D Playford; R S Nicholas; A J Thompson
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb
View more
  1 in total

1.  Rehabilitation needs for older adults with stroke living at home: perceptions of four populations.

Authors:  Claude Vincent; Isabelle Deaudelin; Line Robichaud; Jacqueline Rousseau; Chantal Viscogliosi; Lise R Talbot; Johanne Desrosiers
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 3.921

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.