Literature DB >> 7554628

Results of cemented femoral revision total hip arthroplasty using improved cementing techniques.

R P Katz1, J J Callaghan, P M Sullivan, R C Johnston.   

Abstract

Seventy-nine consecutive femoral component revision total hip arthroplasties done in 73 patients from 1977 to 1983 using a distal intramedullary cement plug and a cement gun delivery system were evaluated to determine if improved results were obtained with newer cementing techniques. At a minimum 10-year followup interval, only 1 patient was not available for followup and 47 hips had minimum 10-year followup radiographs. The incidence of femoral rerevision for aseptic loosening was 9.5% for those hips with minimum 10-year followup and 5.4% for the entire group. The incidence of radiographic femoral failure (defined as a revision or definite or probable loosening) was 26.1% for those hips followed for a minimum of 10 years and 16.3% for the entire group. Compared with historical controls, these results represent an improvement over those reported with the use of earlier cementing techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7554628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  11 in total

1.  Femoral revision with an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component.

Authors:  Lawrence V Gulotta; Andreas Baldini; Kristin Foote; Stephen Lyman; Bryan J Nestor
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-12-01

2.  Bone remodeling after a mean of 10 years in diaphyseal cortical defects repaired with femoral revision using bypass fixation of extensively porous-coated stems with high stiffness.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Fukui; Ayumi Kaneuji; Tanzo Sugimori; Toru Ichiseki; Tadami Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-01-04

3.  Revision hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular tapered stem.

Authors:  Christophe Pattyn; Alexander Mulliez; René Verdonk; Emmanuel Audenaert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  What Can We Learn From 20-year Followup Studies of Hip Replacement?

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; John J Callaghan; Yubo Gao; Andrew J Pugely; Steve S Liu; Lucian C Warth; Devon D Goetz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Fixation of hydroxyapatite-coated revision implants is improved by the surgical technique of cracking the sclerotic bone rim.

Authors:  Brian Elmengaard; Joan E Bechtold; Xinqian Chen; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Basic science considerations in primary total hip replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saqeb B Mirza; Douglas G Dunlop; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Syed G Naqvi; Shafat Gangoo; Saif Salih
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-05-11

7.  Clinical biomechanics of wear in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Douglas R Pedersen; Richard C Johnston; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2003

8.  High complication rate in revision total hip arthroplasty in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Katherine Hwang; Susanna Imrie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Cementless jumbo cups for revision of failed Furlong prosthesis. A case series.

Authors:  Ahmed Salem Eid; Ahmed Kotb; Waleed Elshabrawy
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-11

10.  An experimental animal model of aseptic loosening of hip prostheses in sheep to study early biochemical changes at the interface membrane.

Authors:  Alexander O El-Warrak; Marvin Olmstead; Rebecca Schneider; Lorenz Meinel; Regula Bettschart-Wolfisberger; Margarete K Akens; Joerg Auer; Brigitte von Rechenberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.