Literature DB >> 17619912

Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?

Antonio De Carvalho1, Raphaël Vialle, Laurent Thomsen, Julien Amzallag, Guillaume Cluzel, Hubert Ducou le Pointe, Pierre Mary.   

Abstract

For several years, digitized small radiographs are used to measure Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis. The interobserver and intraobserver Cobb angle measurement variability associated with small radiographs were compared with measurement variability associated with the long-cassette radiographs. Twenty adolescent patients with a double major idiopathic scoliosis had erect full-spine p-A radiographs and Cobb angle measurements performed by eight different observers on a 30 x 90 cm plain-film radiograph and a digitized 14 x 42 cm image. Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability using each techniques were assessed using a paired t-test, Spearman rank correlation study and intraclass correlation coefficients. The angle variability between small film and plain-film measurements was assessed using the same methods. Intra-observer and inter-observer study showed good reliability using both techniques. The comparison between small films and plain-films measurements showed very good agreement with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 95% and confidence interval between 0.962 and 0.972. In our study, Cobb angle determination was not found to vary significantly with film size. The small film image used for full-spine radiographs in our institution allows manual Cobb angle measurements to be performed. A study is currently conducted in our institution to determine if a computer-assisted measurement method significantly improves Cobb angle measurements reliability in routine practice compared with manual measurements of Cobb angles on small films.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17619912      PMCID: PMC2078320          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0437-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  Reliability of soft-copy versus hard-copy interpretation of emergency department radiographs: a prototype study.

Authors:  H L Kundel; M Polansky; M K Dalinka; R H Choplin; W B Gefter; J B Kneelend; W T Miller; W T Miller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Computer-assisted Cobb measurement of scoliosis.

Authors:  Nachiappan Chockalingam; Peter H Dangerfield; Giannis Giakas; Tom Cochrane; John C Dorgan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine.

Authors:  John Cheung; Dirk J Wever; Albert G Veldhuizen; Jean P Klein; Bert Verdonck; Rutger Nijlunsing; Jan C Cool; Jim R Van Horn
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-07-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error.

Authors:  R T Morrissy; G S Goldsmith; E C Hall; D Kehl; G H Cowie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Reliability of the Cobb angle index derived by traditional and computer assisted methods.

Authors:  K E Dutton; T J Jones; B S Slinger; E R Scull; J O'Connor
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.430

7.  The significance of roentgenographic measurement in scoliosis.

Authors:  M Oda; S Rauh; P B Gregory; F N Silverman; E E Bleck
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Reproducibility of spinal back-contour measurements taken with raster stereography in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Roger Lyon; Xue C Liu; John G Thometz; Eric R Nelson; Brent Logan
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2004-02

9.  Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; David D Aronsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Observer variation in assessing spinal curvature and skeletal development in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M S Goldberg; B Poitras; N E Mayo; H Labelle; R Bourassa; R Cloutier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Cobb measurement by chiropractic interns using digital evaluation methods.

Authors:  Jesse Cracknell; Douglas M Lawson; John A Taylor
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-09

2.  Measurement Performance of a Computer Assisted Vertebral Motion Analysis System.

Authors:  Reginald J Davis; David C Lee; Chip Wade; Boyle Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

Review 3.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Intra- and inter-observer reliability of determining radiographic sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis using a manual and a computer-assisted methods.

Authors:  John R Dimar; Leah Y Carreon; Hubert Labelle; Mladen Djurasovic; Mark Weidenbaum; Courtney Brown; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Radiographic scoliosis angle estimation: spline-based measurement reveals superior reliability compared to traditional COBB method.

Authors:  Peter Bernstein; Johannes Metzler; Marlene Weinzierl; Carl Seifert; Wadim Kisel; Markus Wacker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Variability of expert opinion in treatment of early-onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Michael G Vitale; Jaime A Gomez; Hiroko Matsumoto; David P Roye
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Variability in Flexion Extension Radiographs of the Lumbar Spine: A Comparison of Uncontrolled and Controlled Bending.

Authors:  Boyle Cheng; Anthony E Castellvi; Reginald J Davis; David C Lee; Morgan P Lorio; Richard E Prostko; Chip Wade
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-05-16

8.  The height gain in scoliotic deformity correction: assessed by new predictive formula.

Authors:  Ahmet Yılmaz Sarlak; Halil Atmaca; Resul Musaoğlu; Elşen Veli Veliev
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Automated Cobb Angle Measurement for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Wahyu Caesarendra; Wahyu Rahmaniar; John Mathew; Ady Thien
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-03

10.  Dietary Habits Had No Relationship with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Analysis Utilizing Quantitative Data about Dietary Intakes.

Authors:  Keiko Asakura; Takehiro Michikawa; Masashi Takaso; Shohei Minami; Shigeru Soshi; Takashi Tsuji; Eijiro Okada; Katsumi Abe; Masamichi Takahashi; Morio Matsumoto; Yuji Nishiwaki; Kota Watanabe
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.