Literature DB >> 7551775

Emotional expression in upside-down faces: evidence for configurational and componential processing.

S J McKelvie1.   

Abstract

In two experiments, a total of 126 subjects judged the seven emotional expressions of Ekman & Friesen's (1976) pictures of facial affect presented upright or inverted. Inversion reduced accuracy for sad, fear, anger and disgust, and sad was identified as neutral. However, happy was identified almost perfectly on upright and inverted faces, and both anger and disgust were identified significantly often on inverted faces. In addition, the classic confusions between surprise and fear and between disgust and anger occurred on both upright and inverted faces. It is argued that expressions are difficult to identify on inverted faces when they are based on configural information. However, accurate performance on inverted faces and similar confusions on upright and inverted faces are due to componential processing.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7551775     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01067.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6665


  39 in total

1.  Fixation to features and neural processing of facial expressions in a gender discrimination task.

Authors:  Karly N Neath; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Phelps; Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-04

3.  Facial expression discrimination varies with presentation time but not with fixation on features: a backward masking study using eye-tracking.

Authors:  Karly N Neath; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2013-07-23

4.  Saccadic remapping of object-selective information.

Authors:  Benjamin A Wolfe; David Whitney
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Bidirectional electric communication between the inferior occipital gyrus and the amygdala during face processing.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Shota Uono; Kazumi Matsuda; Keiko Usui; Naotaka Usui; Yushi Inoue; Motomi Toichi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Younger and Older Users' Recognition of Virtual Agent Facial Expressions.

Authors:  Jenay M Beer; Cory-Ann Smarr; Arthur D Fisk; Wendy A Rogers
Journal:  Int J Hum Comput Stud       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.632

7.  Unconscious perception of non-threatening facial emotion in parietal extinction.

Authors:  Mark A Williams; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Spared ability to recognise fear from static and moving whole-body cues following bilateral amygdala damage.

Authors:  Anthony P Atkinson; Andrea S Heberlein; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-05-06       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Further evidence of early development of attention to dynamic facial emotions: Reply to Grossmann and Jessen.

Authors:  Alison Heck; Alyson Hock; Hannah White; Rachel Jubran; Ramesh S Bhatt
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-09-27

10.  Are visual measures of mood superior to questionnaire measures in non-Western settings?

Authors:  Gloria Puertas; Vikram Patel; Tom Marshall
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.