Literature DB >> 28573679

Bidirectional electric communication between the inferior occipital gyrus and the amygdala during face processing.

Wataru Sato1, Takanori Kochiyama2, Shota Uono1, Kazumi Matsuda3, Keiko Usui3, Naotaka Usui3, Yushi Inoue3, Motomi Toichi4.   

Abstract

Faces contain multifaceted information that is important for human communication. Neuroimaging studies have revealed face-specific activation in multiple brain regions, including the inferior occipital gyrus (IOG) and amygdala; it is often assumed that these regions constitute the neural network responsible for the processing of faces. However, it remains unknown whether and how these brain regions transmit information during face processing. This study investigated these questions by applying dynamic causal modeling of induced responses to human intracranial electroencephalography data recorded from the IOG and amygdala during the observation of faces, mosaics, and houses in upright and inverted orientations. Model comparisons assessing the experimental effects of upright faces versus upright houses and upright faces versus upright mosaics consistently indicated that the model having face-specific bidirectional modulatory effects between the IOG and amygdala was the most probable. The experimental effect between upright versus inverted faces also favored the model with bidirectional modulatory effects between the IOG and amygdala. The spectral profiles of modulatory effects revealed both same-frequency (e.g., gamma-gamma) and cross-frequency (e.g., theta-gamma) couplings. These results suggest that the IOG and amygdala communicate rapidly with each other using various types of oscillations for the efficient processing of faces. Hum Brain Mapp 38:4511-4524, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amygdala; cross-frequency coupling; dynamic causal modeling (DCM); face; gamma oscillation; inferior occipital gyrus; intracranial electroencephalography (EEG)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28573679      PMCID: PMC6867177          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  88 in total

1.  Changing faces: a detection advantage in the flicker paradigm.

Authors:  T Ro; C Russell; N Lavie
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-01

2.  Face, eye and object early processing: what is the face specificity?

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Marianne Latinus; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The face behind the mask: a developmental study.

Authors:  Nim Tottenham; Andrew C Leon; B J Casey
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2006-05

4.  Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses.

Authors:  C C Chen; S J Kiebel; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Parts and wholes in face recognition.

Authors:  J W Tanaka; M J Farah
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1993-05

6.  Face-selective spectral changes in the human fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  J Klopp; E Halgren; K Marinkovic; V Nenov
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  White-matter connectivity between face-responsive regions in the human brain.

Authors:  Markus Gschwind; Gilles Pourtois; Sophie Schwartz; Dimitri Van De Ville; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Segregating intra-amygdalar responses to dynamic facial emotion with cytoarchitectonic maximum probability maps.

Authors:  René Hurlemann; Anne Kathrin Rehme; Martin Diessel; Juraj Kukolja; Wolfgang Maier; Henrik Walter; Michael X Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8.

Authors:  Vladimir Litvak; Jérémie Mattout; Stefan Kiebel; Christophe Phillips; Richard Henson; James Kilner; Gareth Barnes; Robert Oostenveld; Jean Daunizeau; Guillaume Flandin; Will Penny; Karl Friston
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-06

10.  Is high-spatial frequency information used in the early stages of face detection?

Authors:  H Halit; M de Haan; P G Schyns; M H Johnson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  8 in total

1.  Exploring Age-Related Changes in Resting State Functional Connectivity of the Amygdala: From Young to Middle Adulthood.

Authors:  Ting Xiao; Sheng Zhang; Lue-En Lee; Herta H Chao; Christopher van Dyck; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 5.750

2.  Frequency-dependent neural activity in primary angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Fei Jiang; Chen Yu; Min-Jing Zuo; Chun Zhang; Ying Wang; Fu-Qing Zhou; Xian-Jun Zeng
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.570

3.  Spectral fingerprints of facial affect processing bias in major depression disorder.

Authors:  Haiteng Jiang; Lingling Hua; Zhongpeng Dai; Shui Tian; Zhijian Yao; Qing Lu; Tzvetan Popov
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  An ERP study on facial emotion processing in young people with subjective memory complaints.

Authors:  Vanesa Perez; Ruth Garrido-Chaves; Mario Perez-Alarcón; Tiago O Paiva; Matias M Pulopulos; Vanesa Hidalgo; Alicia Salvador
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Impairment of emotional expression detection after unilateral medial temporal structure resection.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Naotaka Usui; Reiko Sawada; Akihiko Kondo; Motomi Toichi; Yushi Inoue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Abnormal developmental trends of functional connectivity in young children with infantile esotropia.

Authors:  Jianlin Guo; Yuanyuan Chen; Wen Liu; Lijuan Huang; Di Hu; Yanqiu Lv; Huiying Kang; Ningdong Li; Yun Peng
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  Amygdala Represents Diverse Forms of Intangible Knowledge, That Illuminate Social Processing and Major Clinical Disorders.

Authors:  C S E Weston
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception.

Authors:  Francesco Bossi; Isabella Premoli; Sara Pizzamiglio; Sema Balaban; Paola Ricciardelli; Davide Rivolta
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.