Literature DB >> 7536993

Screening for prostate cancer.

M L Cher1, P R Carroll.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is a serious health care problem in the United States. Whether or not to screen for it has become a timely issue. Although a large number of men have clinically important, asymptomatic, undetected prostate cancer, an even larger number have clinically unimportant cancer. To justify screening programs, not only must we avoid detecting biologically unimportant cancers, we must also detect and effectively treat that subset of tumors that, if undiagnosed, would progress, produce symptoms, and reduce life expectancy. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay, or its variations such as PSA density, PSA velocity, and age-specific reference ranges, and the digital rectal examination are the best tests for detecting clinically important, asymptomatic, curable tumors. Recent data suggest that using serum PSA levels does not result in an overdetection of unimportant tumors. Highly effective, curative treatment of localized prostate cancer is available. These factors promote optimism that screening for prostate cancer will ultimately prove beneficial. Nonetheless, men should be informed regarding the benefits and possible risks before being screened for prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7536993      PMCID: PMC1022708     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  66 in total

1.  Latent carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  L M FRANKS
Journal:  J Pathol Bacteriol       Date:  1954-10

2.  PSA screening for asymptomatic prostate cancer: truth in advertising.

Authors:  D L Hahn; R G Roberts
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 3.  Hereditary prostate cancer: epidemiologic and clinical features.

Authors:  B S Carter; G S Bova; T H Beaty; G D Steinberg; B Childs; W B Isaacs; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Screening for prostate cancer. Comparison of transrectal ultrasound, prostate specific antigen and rectal examination.

Authors:  P Perrin; J H Maquet; G Bringeon; M Devonec
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1991-09

5.  Detection of organ-confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-specific antigen-based screening.

Authors:  W J Catalona; D S Smith; T L Ratliff; J W Basler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Prostate cancer screening: what we know and what we need to know.

Authors:  B S Kramer; M L Brown; P C Prorok; A L Potosky; J K Gohagan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Early detection of prostate cancer by routine screening.

Authors:  G W Chodak; H W Schoenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Adenocarcinoma of the prostate: results of routine urological screening.

Authors:  I M Thompson; J J Ernst; M P Gangai; C R Spence
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Probabilities of eventually developing or dying of cancer--United States, 1985.

Authors:  H Seidman; M H Mushinski; S K Gelb; E Silverberg
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  2 in total

1.  Screening for prostate cancer today.

Authors:  J N Kabalin
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-03

2.  More on the prostate cancer screening controversy.

Authors:  T G Ganiats
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.