Literature DB >> 6471214

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate: results of routine urological screening.

I M Thompson, J J Ernst, M P Gangai, C R Spence.   

Abstract

The results of routine urological screening of 2,005 men between 40 and 70 years old were reviewed. Digital rectal examination was used to screen for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Of 65 nodules detected 17 proved to be adenocarcinoma. Clinical staging revealed no evidence of metastases in all but 2 patients but pathological (surgical) examination resulted in upstaging of disease in 66 per cent of the patients who underwent an operation. Digital rectal examination proved to be an insensitive screening device with poor predictive value. The use of adjunctive screening tools for detection of adenocarcinoma of the prostate is suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6471214     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49828-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

Review 1.  Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory L Lacy; Douglas W Soderdahl; Javier Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Is deleting the digital rectal examination a good idea?

Authors:  M A Sutton; R P Gibbons; R J Correa
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-07

Review 3.  Periodic health examination, 1991 update: 3. Secondary prevention of prostate cancer. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Interventional radiology of the lower urinary tract and its relationship to surgical treatment.

Authors:  F Castañeda; J M Hernández-Graulau; W R Castañeda-Zúñiga
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Screening for carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  D P Sandhu; C P Chilton; K W Munson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-16

6.  Temporal changes in the clinical approach to diagnosing prostate cancer.

Authors:  William M Hilton; Susan S Padalecki; Donna P Ankerst; Robin J Leach; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

7.  Expectant management as an option for men with stage T1c prostate cancer: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J L Mohler; B T Williams; J A Freeman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna P Ankerst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Efficient pathway for early detection of prostate cancer concluded from a 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  E P Allhoff; S G Liedke; O Gonnermann; C G Stief; U Jonas; B Schneider
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  [Validity of digital rectal examination in the era of prostate specific antigen].

Authors:  E Alonso-Sandoica; J Jara-Rascón; J I Martínez-Salamanca; C Hernández-Fernández
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.