Literature DB >> 7527770

The effects of stimulus rates upon median, ulnar and radial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials.

M Fujii1, T Yamada, M Aihara, Y Kokubun, Y Noguchi, M Matsubara, M H Yeh.   

Abstract

We examined the effect of stimulus rates on the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) amplitude following stimulation of the median nerve (MN) and the ulnar nerve (UN) at the elbow or wrist, and the radial nerve (RN) at the wrist in 12 normal subjects. We measured the amplitude of frontal (P14-N18-P22-N30) and parietal peaks (P14-N20-P26-N34) at a stimulus rate of 1.1, 3.5 and 5.7 Hz. The amplitude attenuation was found at frontal P22 and N30 and to a lesser degree at parietal N20 and P26 peaks with an increasing stimulus rate from 1.1 to 5.7 Hz. The amplitude attenuation was greatest at the elbow when compared to the wrist stimulation for both MN and UN. The attenuation was least for wrist stimulation for the RN. The UN block by local anesthesia just distal to the stimulus electrode at the elbow abolished the amplitude attenuation caused by the fast stimulus rate. The observed amplitude attenuation with the faster stimulus rate is probably due, in part, to interference from the "secondary" afferent inputs. The secondary afferent inputs arise from peripheral receptor stimulation (muscle, joint and/or cutaneous) as a subsequent effect of efferent volleys initiated from the point of stimulation. The greater number of peripheral receptors being activated as more proximal sites of stimulation in a mixed nerve would result in greater attenuation of the SEP recorded from scalp electrodes. We postulate that the attenuation of frontal peaks by the fast stimulus rate is due to the frontal projection of interfering "secondary" afferent inputs.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7527770     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90136-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  17 in total

1.  Temporal discrimination of two passive movements in humans: a new psychophysical approach to assessing kinaesthesia.

Authors:  Michele Tinazzi; Clementina Stanzani; Mirta Fiorio; Nicola Smania; Giuseppe Moretto; Antonio Fiaschi; Mark J Edwards; Kailash P Bhatia; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Altered cortical integration of dual somatosensory input following the cessation of a 20 min period of repetitive muscle activity.

Authors:  Heidi Haavik Taylor; B A Murphy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Selective changes in cerebellar-cortical processing following motor training.

Authors:  H Haavik; B A Murphy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Somatosensory mechanical response and digit somatotopy within cortical areas of the postcentral gyrus in humans: an MEG study.

Authors:  Ken Inoue; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Hikmat Hadoush; Hiroshi Kurumadani; Akira Hashizume; Toru Sunagawa; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The effects of subclinical neck pain on sensorimotor integration following a complex motor pursuit task.

Authors:  Danielle Andrew; Paul Yielder; Heidi Haavik; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Interactive effect of acute pain and motor learning acquisition on sensorimotor integration and motor learning outcomes.

Authors:  Erin Dancey; Bernadette Murphy; Danielle Andrew; Paul Yielder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Difference in somatosensory evoked fields elicited by mechanical and electrical stimulations: Elucidation of the human homunculus by a noninvasive method.

Authors:  Ken Inoue; Takushi Shirai; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Akira Hashizume; Toshihide Harada; Yasuyo Mimori; Masayasu Matsumoto
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Does stimulus rate matter when performing somatosensory evoked potentials for coma patients?

Authors:  Lawrence R Robinson; Paula J Micklesen
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  The effect of experimental pain on motor training performance and sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  Erin Dancey; Bernadette Murphy; John Srbely; Paul Yielder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Dishabituation of laser-evoked EEG responses: dissecting the effect of certain and uncertain changes in stimulus spatial location.

Authors:  D M Torta; M Liang; E Valentini; A Mouraux; G D Iannetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.